Case Reports: 2025 Vol: 31 Issue: 1S
Akinobu Kato, Hitotsubashi University
Citation Information: Kato, A. (2025). The influence of government policies on business economics: Taxation, trade, and regulation. Journal of the International Academy for Case Studies, 31(S1), 1-3.
Government policies significantly impact business economics through taxation, trade regulations, and broader regulatory frameworks. These policies shape market behavior, influence investment decisions, and determine the competitive landscape. This case report examines the impact of the U.S.-China trade war on businesses, highlighting how tariffs, corporate tax policies, and regulatory changes affect economic performance. It explores the economic consequences of government intervention and offers recommendations for businesses to navigate policy shifts effectively.
Business Economics, Government Policy, Taxation, Trade War, Regulation, Economic Growth, Market Competition.
Government policies play a crucial role in shaping the economic environment in which businesses operate (Monti, 2022). Through taxation, trade regulations, and regulatory oversight, governments influence business profitability, market entry, and global competitiveness. A key example of this impact is the U.S.-China trade war, which disrupted global supply chains, increased production costs, and altered international trade dynamics. This case report analyzes how government interventions affect businesses and what strategies they can adopt to mitigate risks (Lesnikowski et al., 2017).
Background
The U.S.-China trade war, which began in 2018, was a direct result of increased tariffs imposed by both nations. The U.S. government, under the Trump administration, levied tariffs on over $360 billion worth of Chinese goods, citing concerns over intellectual property theft, unfair trade practices, and trade imbalances. China retaliated with its own tariffs on American exports, escalating economic tensions (Stoynov, 2019).
Impact on Businesses
The trade war affected multiple industries, with key consequences including (Fetzer et al., 2021):
• Increased Production Costs: U.S. companies reliant on Chinese imports faced higher costs due to tariffs, affecting profit margins.
• Supply Chain Disruptions: Businesses were forced to restructure supply chains to avoid tariff-heavy imports, leading to delays and additional costs.
• Market Volatility: Uncertainty surrounding trade negotiations resulted in market instability, affecting business investment decisions.
Regulatory Challenges
The trade war also introduced new compliance regulations, requiring businesses to adjust to shifting legal frameworks. Companies had to navigate (Pempel, 2019):
• Import and Export Restrictions: Compliance with new tariffs required businesses to modify sourcing strategies (Grant et al., 2021).
• Foreign Investment Barriers: Restrictions on Chinese investments in U.S. technology sectors influenced business partnerships.
• Corporate Tax Policy Adjustments: U.S. tax reforms, such as the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, attempted to offset trade war damages by reducing corporate tax burdens.
Government taxation policies directly impact business operations by influencing (Furceri et al., 2022):
• Corporate Taxation: Lower corporate taxes encourage investment, while higher taxes may deter business expansion.
• Consumer Taxes (VAT and Sales Tax): Higher consumption taxes reduce purchasing power, affecting demand for goods and services.
• Tariff Policies: Protectionist tariffs can shield domestic industries but often result in retaliatory measures from trading partners.
A notable example is the U.K.'s post-Brexit tax policies, where businesses faced regulatory uncertainty and fluctuating trade agreements, affecting investment decisions (Hasanah, 2024).
Regulatory policies affect business economics in several ways:
• Governments regulate monopolistic practices to ensure fair competition.
• Example: The European Union's antitrust fines against Google for anti-competitive behavior.
• Stricter labor laws increase business costs but improve working conditions.
• Example: The Paris Agreement pushed companies toward sustainable energy solutions, affecting energy sector investments.
Businesses can mitigate the impact of government policies through (Gale, 2024):
• Diversified Supply Chains: Reducing reliance on a single country minimizes trade risks.
• Lobbying and Advocacy: Engaging with policymakers helps businesses influence favorable regulations (Artuc et al., 2021).
• Tax Optimization Strategies: Using tax incentives and legal frameworks to minimize financial burdens.
Government policies on taxation, trade, and regulation have profound effects on business economics. The U.S.-China trade war demonstrates how sudden policy shifts can disrupt markets, increase costs, and alter competitive dynamics. By adopting proactive strategies, businesses can navigate policy changes and maintain resilience in an evolving economic landscape. Policymakers must also consider the long-term economic impact of their decisions to ensure stable growth and global cooperation.
Artuc, E., Porto, G., & Rijkers, B. (2021). Household impacts of tariffs: data and results from agricultural trade protection. The World Bank Economic Review, 35(3), 563-585.
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Fetzer, T., & Schwarz, C. (2021). Tariffs and politics: Evidence from Trump’s trade wars. The Economic Journal, 131(636), 1717-1741.
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Furceri, D., Hannan, S. A., Ostry, J. D., & Rose, A. K. (2022). The macroeconomy after tariffs. The World Bank Economic Review, 36(2), 361-381.
Gale, W. G., Hoopes, J. L., & Pomerleau, K. (2024). Sweeping Changes and an Uncertain Legacy: The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 38(3), 3-32.
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Grant, J. H., Arita, S., Emlinger, C., Johansson, R., & Xie, C. (2021). Agricultural exports and retaliatory trade actions: An empirical assessment of the 2018/2019 trade conflict. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 43(2), 619-640.
Hasanah, L. (2024). Global Strategies: Navigating the Complexities of International Business in a Connected World. Advances in Business & Industrial Marketing Research, 2(1), 36-47.
Lesnikowski, A., Ford, J., Biesbroek, R., Berrang-Ford, L., Maillet, M., Araos, M., & Austin, S. E. (2017). What does the Paris Agreement mean for adaptation?. Climate Policy, 17(7), 825-831.
Monti, G. (2022). Taming Digital Monopolies: A Comparative Account of the Evolution of Antitrust and Regulation in the European Union and the United States. The Antitrust Bulletin, 67(1), 40-68.
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Pempel, T. J. (2019). Right target; wrong tactics: The Trump administration upends East Asian order. The Pacific Review, 32(6), 996-1018.
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Stoynov, V. (2019). Bringing the EU Competition Rules in the Digital Market-the Commission Decision in the Google Android Case. SCRIPTed, 16, 49.
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Received: 02-Feb-2025, Manuscript No. jiacs-25-15820; Editor assigned: 03-Feb-2025, PreQC No. jiacs-25-15820(PQ); Reviewed: 17-Feb-2025, QC No. jiacs-25-15820; Revised: 21-Feb-2025, Manuscript No. jiacs-25-15820(R); Published: 28-Feb-2025