Research Article: 2021 Vol: 27 Issue: 3
Lasmy, Bina Nusantara University
Tirta Nugraha Mursitama, Bina Nusantara University
Asnan Furinto, Bina Nusantara University
Setyo Hari Wijanto, Indonesia University
MSMEs can contribute to Indonesia's GDP more than large businesses and have a significant workforce absorption. MSMEs need to scale up, which is also one of the Ministry of MSMEs and cooperatives' work programs. This study looking for how to booster small business performance. There are two independent variables, sensing capability and exposure to entrepreneurial ecosystem. One dependent variable, small business performance. This research is a quantitative study, distributing questionnaires online with a total number of respondents of 459 small businesses in the F&B sector in Jakarta with age> 3 years, and data analysis using SPSS. This study's results are sensing capability and exposure to entrepreneurial ecosystems affect small business performance partially and simultaneously.
Sensing Capability, Exposure t o Entrepreneurial Ecosystem, Small Business Performance.
An Austrian political economist who is the most influential economist of the 20th century said that entrepreneurship has long been a major force for the economic development of a country (Schumpeter, 1934). This also triggers the interest of researchers from various scientific backgrounds to conduct research related to entrepreneurship in various countries, types of industry and business scale. Based on a recent survey, the number of small-scale businesses in Indonesia is 783.132 unit, much greater than that of medium-scale businesses is 60.702 unit. However, medium-scale businesses are able to contribute to Indonesia's GDP 1.923.715 billion, far more than the contribution made by small-scale businesses 1.347.104 billion. In other words, if more and more small-scale businesses were able to upgrade to medium-scale enterprises, the GDP of the Indonesian state could be even better. This is also one of the work programs of the Indonesian Ministry of Cooperatives and SMEs which targets 6% of Indonesian small businesses to progress to the middle class in the next five years (Depkop, 2020; Okezone, 2020).
Some of the difficulties experienced by efforts to graduate from class include insecurity in technology, lack of knowledge, management skills, innovation, networking and capital (Pasardana, 2019; Awaludin, 2019). Another important ability for an entrepreneur is sensing capability. Several studies have shown that sensing capability has a positive effect on business performance in Kenya (Kihara et al., 2016), sensing capability plays an important role in business performance in the logistics industry (Sudrajat et al., 2019) but different with (Lindblom et al., 2008) who argue that sensing capability does not have a significant effect on business performance in retail businesses. Entrepreneurs are unlikely to be active individually (Autio et al., 2014; Greve & Salaff, 2003) and entrepreneurial activities are social activities that are relational (Granovetter, 1985). Daniel Isenberg, a Professor of entrepreneurship from Babson College and also the founder of the Babson Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Project (BEEP) said that an entrepreneur or entrepreneur can be successful and continue to grow when the entrepreneur has access to human, financial, professional resources and operates in an environment where government policies encourage and protect entrepreneurs. This network is called the entrepreneurial ecosystem. EEE plays a key role both as a cultural repository where entrepreneurial stories are archived and shared and as a social network where venture capitalists, mentors, experienced entrepreneurs, and a talented workforce regularly come together (Pittz & Hertz, 2017).
The increase in the number of women and men entrepreneurs who are oriented towards business growth is very important for the economy because they are the ones who create jobs, absorb unemployment, reduce poverty, involve the community, and have high productivity, innovation and export (Mason & Brown, 2013). Therefore, this study aims to analyze the effect of exposure to entrepreneurial ecosystem and sensing capability in encouraging the performance of small-scale Indonesian businesses engaged in the food and beverage sector, business age >3 years, located in Jakarta and have a desire to move up the class. In the end, this research will provide theoretical as well as practical contributions.
There are different views on the theory that is used as a reference in small-scale business performance research. Research in 1988 stated that there is no correct theory for small businesses because not all of them include a framework that is able to explain and become a reference for small business management (D’Amboise & Muldowney, 1988). Meanwhile, other research views resource-based theory (Amit & Schoemaker, 1993; Barney, 1991; Esteve- Pérez & Mañez-Castillejo, 2008; Hanlon & Saunders, 2007; Sirmon & Hitt, 2003) and strategic adaptation perspective as the most appropriate theory (Dollinger, 1999). This view believes that tangible and intangible resources such as the adoption of e-commerce in business activities are significant for a business's performance. However, they are not sufficient to improve performance it takes skills continuously developed to make strategy adaptation (Ucbasaran et al., 2001). The LPPI (Indonesian Banking Development Institute) and Bank Indonesia (2015) divide the characteristics of small businesses based on revenue per year, >300 - 2.5 billion.
Sensing Capability (SC)
SC is one of the five elements of dynamic capabilities that support organizational resilience (Baškarada & Koronios, 2018) which includes sensing, searching, seizing, shifting, and shaping (Teece, 2017). SC is a company's activity in identifying, developing and accessing opportunities related to customer needs; mobilization of resources in dealing with needs and opportunities, capturing value and transforming capabilities refers to changing or reconfiguring resources to maintain new or different values. SC is not positively related to retail business financial performance (Ardyan, 2016; Lindblom et al., 2008). Meanwhile, other researchers argue that SC is part of dynamic abilities and affects business performance (Buil-Fabregà et al., 2017; Jantunen et al., 2018; Murray et al., 2016; Zimuto & Maritz, 2019).
Exposure to Entrepreneurial Ecosystem (EEE)
Ecosystem refers to the interaction of an organism with its environment as a unit. Thus, the term Entrepreneurial Ecosystem (EE) refers to a combination of actors and factors that play a role in entrepreneurship development (Pereverzeva, 2015). The EE requires a certain set of elements or attributes to be able to develop (Mack & Mayer, 2016; Roundy, 2017) such as a strong market, creating entrepreneurial opportunities, attracting skilled workforce, networks between entrepreneurs that provide skills, support, and guidance, and cultural orientation (Spigel, 2017). Isenberg builds an entrepreneurial ecosystem framework consisting of policy, finance, culture, support, human resources and markets (Isenberg, 2010). The EE as a platform for providing the necessary support, guides, mentors, motivates and promotes entrepreneurial activities so as to improve the performance of SME businesses in Malaysia (Rajah et al., 2019). Business performance is influenced not only by internal factors (for example, workforce skills, investment levels, innovation strategies, and marketing) but also on the quantity and quality of interactions with external stakeholders through the entrepreneurial ecosystem platform.
Small Business Performance (SBP)
Performance is an important thing that every company must achieve because performance reflects its ability to manage and allocate its resources. Measurement of business performance is not sufficient only to measure finan1cially such as sales growth, profit and ROI but also non-financial measurements such as customer satisfaction, employee satisfaction reputation and innovation (Ong et al., 2016; Jain & Moreno, 2015; Sucahyo et al., 2016; Tseng & Lee, 2014).
Based on the review above, the research hypothesis in this study:
H1: Sensing Capability (SC) has a positive effect on small business performance (SBP).
H2: Exposure to Entrepreneurial Ecosystem (EEE) has a positive effect on small business performance (SBP).
H3: Exposure to Entrepreneurial Ecosystem (EEE) and Sensing Capability (SC) has a positive effect on small business performance (SBP) simultaneously.
The method adopted in this research is quantitative. Data collection using a questionnaire instrument. The questionnaire was distributed online through the association channels and the entrepreneur community. Then the questionnaire data that has been successfully collected, are further analysed such as descriptive analysis to determine the characteristics of the business profile, the characteristics of the respondent's profile and a description of the results of the answers to the questionnaire statements. Then further testing the validity, reliability and hypothesis of the relationship between variables with the help of the SPSS application. Data collection method is cross-sectional. That is, data is only taken within a certain period of time (Sekaran & Bougie, 2013). The sampling technique used nonprobability sampling - purposive sampling with the criteria of the respondents being smallscale business owners in the food and beverage sector, located in Jakarta, with a minimum age of 3 years and wanting to be promoted. The Indonesian Central Statistics Agency reported that the number of small businesses in Jakarta in 2018 was 9,791 units, so the minimum sample required was 385 by calculating the taro yamane formula (Yamane, 1967). Then the measurement scale uses a 6 likert scale.
Distribution of online questionnaires to business owners through various associations, entrepreneurial communities and personal channels. The data received was then screened according to the criteria of the respondents in this study and obtained as many as 459 respondents.
Descriptive statistical analysis contains the analysis unit's profile and the respondents who participated in answering the distributed questionnaires (shows in Table 1).
Respondent and Small Business
|Level of education||Collage||49|
|Below or high school or equal||51|
|Business age||3-5 Years||32|
|Type of business||Food||48|
|Food & Beverage||41|
|Business Location||West Jakarta||27|
|Income in a year
|>1 billion-2.5 billion||3|
The pattern of the respondents' answers is summarized and to help understand or interpret the mean results of the variables, these results are converted to Percent of Maximum Possible (POMP) scores (Cohen et al., 1999) which have a scale of 0-100. This POMP is widely used as an alternative score standardization in psychology research (Fischer & Milfont, 2010). The range of POMP score results, namely 66.69-83.35, which means that the respondents agree, feel satisfied and consider the latent variables SC, EEE and SBP, their dimensions and indicators necessary. Then, the validity and reliability test using SPSS and the result is valid and reliable.
Based on Table 2, the results of hypothesis 1 test, the effect of SC on SBP is the sig value of .000 <0.05 and the t-count value of 4.728> t-table 1.96 so that it can be concluded that there is an effect of SC on SBP. Then the results of hypothesis test 2, the effect of EEE to SBP is a sig value of .000 <0.05 and the t-count value of 5,557> t-table 1.96 so that it can be concluded that there is an effect of EEE on SBP.
Statistical variables of personality traits (X1) Statistics
Based on Table 3, namely the results of testing hypothesis 3 with SPSS, the simultaneous influence of SC and EEE on SBP is a sig value of 0.000<0.05 and an f-count value of 68.192>f-table 3.02 so it can be concluded that there is an effect of SC and EEE simultaneously on SBP.
|Model||Sum of Squares||df||Mean Square||F||Sig.|
Dependent variable: SBP
Predictors: (Constant), EEE, SC
Then the coefficient of determination test is carried out to find out how big the simultaneous effect is. Based on the output above (shows in Table 3), it is known that the rsquare value is 0.230, this means that the simultaneous effect of SC and EEE on SBP is 23%.
|Model||R||R square||Adjusted R square||Std Error of the Estimate|
Predictors: (Constant), EEE, SC
Based on the review in the previous section, it can be concluded that all of the dimension, indicator is necessary; all independent variables have an influence on the dependent variable partially and simultaneously. In addition, EEE has a greater influence on SBP,19% than SC, 17%, partially and 23% simultaneously. This means that small businesses in Jakarta need to immediately join various entrepreneurial ecosystems such as communities, employers' associations to get support, motivation, access, and policies in entrepreneurship. As stated in the results of previous research that entrepreneurship is a relational activity; it is very unlikely for a business to run alone without a linkage with an ecosystem similar to the surrounding environment such as suppliers, government, associations, fellow entrepreneurs and others. Entrepreneurs can build relationships with various stakeholders through the entrepreneurial ecosystem so that opportunities to develop their business are also greater. In addition, by joining an entrepreneurial ecosystem, it allows entrepreneurs to get various opportunities to offer relevant programs, share knowledge, information, enrich skills, add partners who can have a positive impact on their personal and business performance. Furthermore, small business entrepreneurs hone sensing skills such as recognizing new opportunities, creating new opportunities and not becoming a follower. Then when the entrepreneur has joined the ecosystem and has a good sensing capability, the effort is able to booster the performance of his or her business and scale up. In addition, the results of hypothesis testing support several previous studies.
This research has achieved its objectives and answered questions. However, future research still has certain limitations, such as adding new variables such as gender, expanding the scope of research, conducting this research with an experimental approach, and others.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(6), 179-211.
Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G., & Johnson, J.C. (2018). Analyzing social networks. Sage.
Brandstätter, H. (2011). Personality aspects of entrepreneurship: A look at five meta-analyses. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(3), 222–230.
Burga, R., & Rezania, D. (2016). Stakeholder theory in social entrepreneurship: a descriptive case study. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 6(1), 4.
Camagni, R. (2017). Regional competitiveness: towards a concept of territorial capital. In Seminal Studies in Regional and Urban Economics (pp. 115–131). Springer, Cham.
Chia, C.C., & Liang, C. (2016). Influence of creativity and social capital on entrepreneurial intentions of tourism students. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management, and Innovation, 12(2), 151–168.
Chia, C.C., & Liang, C. (2016). Influence of creativity and social capital on the entrepreneurial intention of tourism students. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management, and Innovation, 12(2), 151–168.
Çolakoğlu, N., & Gözükara, İ. (2016). A comparison study on personality traits based on the attitudes of university students toward entrepreneurship. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Procedia-S(229), 133–140.
Davidsson, P., & Honig, B. (2003). The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(3), 301–331.
Faruq, F.F., & Anak, B. (2015). Indonesia Raih Juara 1 di Kompetisi Wirausaha Sosial Spanyol.
Funder, D.C. (2001). The personality puzzle (2nd ed.). Norton.
Gurbuz, G., & Aykol, S. (2008). Entrepreneurial Intention of Young Educated Public in Turkey. Journal of Global Strategic Management, 4, 47–56.
Hmieleski, K.M., & Corbett, A.C. (2006). Proclivity for improvisation as a predictor of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Small Business Management, 48(1), 45-63.
İrengün, O., & Arıkboğa, S. (2015). The effect of personality traits on social entrepreneurship intentions: A field research. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 1186–1195.
Karabulut, A.T. (2016). Personality traits on entrepreneurial intention. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 229, 12–21.
Krueger, N. (1993). The Impact of Prior Entrepreneurial Exposure on Perceptions of New Venture Feasibility and Desirability. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18(1), 5–21.
Lee, S. H., & Wong, P.K. (2004). An exploratory study of technopreneurs intentions: a career anchor perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(1), 7–28.
Lewis, K.V., Ho, M., Harris, C., & Morrison, R. (2016). Becoming an entrepreneur: opportunities and identity transitions. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 8(2), 98-116.
Liang, C.T., Chia, T.L., & Liang, C. (2015). Effect of personality differences in shaping entrepreneurial intentions. International. Journal of Business and Social Science, 6(4), 166–176.
Lins, K.V., Servaes, H., & Tamayo, A. (2017). Social capital, trust, and firm performance: The value of corporate social responsibility during the financial crisis. The Journal of Finance, 72(4), 1785-1824.
Pfeifer, S., Šarlija, N., & Zekić Sušac, M. (2016). Shaping the Entrepreneurial Mindset: Entrepreneurial Intentions of Business Students in Croatia. Journal of Small Business Management, 54(1), 102–117.
Pruett, M. (2012). Entrepreneurship education: Workshops and entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Education for Business, 87, 94–101.
Şahin, F., Karadağ, H., & Tuncer, B. (2019). Big five personality traits, entrepreneurial self-efficacy, and entrepreneurial intention. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 25(6), 1188–1211.
Sharma, L. (2014). Impact of family capital & social capital on youth entrepreneurship: A study of Uttarakhand state, India. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 4(14), 1–18.
Sucahyo, N. (2017). Anak Muda dan Geliat Wirausaha Sosial.
Syahchari, D.H., & Kurnia, L.H. (2019). The Effect of Leadership Style and Compensation on Organizational Commitment of Babinsa in Jakarta. Jurnal Pertahanan, 4(2), 70.
Tatarko, A., & Schmidt, P. (2018). Individual social capital and the implementation of entrepreneurial intentions: The case of Russia. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 19(1), 76–85.
Thompson, E.R. (2008). Development and validation of an international English big-five mini-markers. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(6), 542–548.
Thompson, E.R. (2009). Individual entrepreneurial intent: Construct clarification and development of an internationally reliable metric. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 669-694.
Utami, D.A., Noviyanti, N., Putra, G.G., & Prasetyawan. (2017). Sociopreneurship sebagai Alternatif Pemberdayaan Masyarakat dan Pengentasan Kemiskinan. Jurnal Ilmuwan Administrasi Negara ASIAN, 5(2).
Vita Ayu A. (2018). 3 Wirausaha Sosial Asal Indonesia Pemenang DBS-NUS Social Venture Challenge Asia 2017.