Keywords:

Infrastructure, Public Private Partnership, Risks, Substantive Law, Formal Law

Citation Information:

Kurniawan, W., Endarto, B., Prasetyo, I., Aliyyah, N., Helmi, R., Indriastuti, D.E., … & Kalbuana, N, (2021). The role of law in public private partnership: Indonesia. Journal of Management Information and Decision Sciences, 24(S6), 1-11.

Introduction

The availability of infrastructure is condition sine qua non for the community both to meet social and economic needs. For social life, infrastructure is useful to meet the needs and improve the mobility of the society. Infrastructure is also indispensable in economic activity to reduce investment and production costs. The global economy will need $ 90 trillion for infrastructure provision for 2016 to 2030, which is allocated an average of $ 5-6 trillion annually (Bhattacharya et, all, Working Paper 91, p. 8). Of the total investment required, developing countries in Asia will invest of $ 26 trillion (The World Bank, 2017, p. 10). The funds are needed to maintain economic growth, eradicate poverty, and respond to climate change.

Indonesia is one of the countries in Asia that intensively build infrastructure. According to the National Development Planning Agency, the score of Indonesian infrastructure quality is only 4.2, This score is below the average of ASEAN countries, which are 4.4 (National Development Planning Agency, 2017, Public Private Partnerships: Infrastructure Projects Plan in Indonesia, p. vi). This proves that infrastructure is still an obstacle to national development. The implication of inadequate availability of infrastructure is increasing the transportation and logistics costs. These costs would be enormously if accumulated nationally and affect the competitiveness of national products at the international level. In the National Mid-term Government Plan 2015-2019 states the provisions of infrastructures are based on the equitable development as the objective of national development (National Mid-Term Development Plan 2015-2019, point 6-85).

The implementation of equitable development is constructing infrastructures nationally. Infrastructure provisions are for every region in Indonesia and not centralized on the Java Island. Furthermore, the purpose of this infrastructure’s development is to connect between regions in Indonesia. The state budget, however, has been insufficient to improve infrastructures to support the massive movement of the government policy in infrastructures. To overcome the limitations of these funds, the government provide an opportunity for the private sectors to be involved in the provisions of infrastructures. The government attract the private sectors to engage the provision of infrastructures with the Public Private Partnerships (PPP) scheme. This scheme has advantages for the state. The first advantage is the development and financing facilities carried out by the private sectors. Secondly, the private sector bears the risks incurred at the stage of construction and operation of infrastructure facilities. The government do not responsible for any losses incurred on the infrastructure provision.

However, PPP is not at all riskless. In the infrastructure development activities using Public Private Partnerships (PPP) model is facing risks in three levels, which are macro, meso, and micro. The risks may occur in pre and post completion and result in termination of the development or operational of infrastructure facilities. This termination has direct impact on investors and creditors. In infrastructure development with this Public Private Partnerships (PPP) model, private sectors finance 30% to 45% of the total projects (National Development Planning Agency, 2017). The projects are financing from the capital market, money market, or syndicated loans. In these circumstances, investors and creditors bear the risks to the certainty of project implementation. The impact would be even greater on the sustainability of development plans that depend on the infrastructures are being built. As fundamentally understood that infrastructures development aim to provide the public interest to meet public needs and improve efficiency. The lack of infrastructures, territories and communities would not develop. Therefore, laws and regulations framework are required to manage these risks. These laws and regulations contain a substantive or formal legal order as standards for the implementation of Public Private Partnerships (PPP) model projects.

This article will be divided into five sections. The first section describes the basic conception of Public Private Partnerships (PPP). The second section presents the characteristics of PPP to illustrate the differences with the procurement and privatization model. The third section explains the applicable PPP laws and regulations in Indonesia. The fourth section clarifies the types of risks in PPP. The fifth section explain the substantive law and formal law as a tool to mitigate the risks that will arise in the development and operationalization of Public Private Partnerships (PPP) projects through three aspects: planning and preparation aspect, procurement aspects of project business entity, and contracts to reduce uncertainty over the relationship between government and private in Public Private Partnerships (PPP).

The Concept of Public Private Partnerships (PPP)

Public Private Partnerships (PPP) itself. This section shows the definitions from international organisations and followed by the definition based on applicable Indonesian law. These definitions will be elaborated to establish the scope and framework of the Public Private Partnerships (PPP) concept. The first definition is from Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. According to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Public Private Partnerships (PPP) is an agreement between the government and one or more private parties. In the agreement, the private sector provides services to gain profit in which the services are included in the objectives of government expectation to provide public utilities.

The second definition is from the World Bank that states Public Private Partnerships (PPP) is a long-term contract between the government and the private sector in terms of building and/or managing facilities or services to public (World Bank, 2004). The private sector bears risks and responsible for managing at all times as stipulated in the agreement. The private sector obtains the results of such management based on the implementation of management and/or demand or use of what it manages. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) defines the Public Private Partnerships (PPP) is an agreement whereby the private sector provides infrastructure in the form of assets and services traditionally carried out by the government. In the PPP, the private sector is the party that provide and invest the infrastructure. This means that there is a transfer of the risks from the government to the private sector considering that both investment and infrastructure management are on the private sector.

The definition of Public Private Partnerships (PPP) contained in legislation in Indonesia is in Article 1 Point 6 of Presidential Regulation Number 38 of 2015 on Government Cooperation with Legal Entities in the Infrastructure Providing (hereinafter abbreviated as ‘Presidential Regulation of Public Private Partnerships (PPP)'), which affirms that:

"The co-operation among the Government with the business entity in the provision of public interest infrastructure, referencing in part or entirely the resource utilization of the business entity, the prescribed specifications of the Minister/ Head of Institution/Regional Head/Regional Owned Entity."

According to the definitions mentioned above, it can sort out the elements of Public Private Partnerships (PPP). Firstly, the Public Private Partnerships (PPP) contains a long-term agreement between the government and the private sector. Based on the Presidential Regulation of Public Private Partnerships (PPP), it is stipulated that the government are ministry, heads of institutions, regional heads, state-owned enterprises, or regional-owned enterprises. The private party wins the tender of the procurement phase forming a Special Purpose Vehicle. Special Purpose Vehicle is a company established specially in carrying out the project. Special Purpose Vehicle in Presidential Regulation of Public Private Partnerships (PPP) is also called Public Private Partnerships (PPP) Implementing Enterprise (PPP-IE). PPP-IE is a limited liability company (Law 40/2007). Established by a business entity that wins the tender or appointed directly to carry out the project.

Secondly, the private sectors undertake the development and management of facility. Private parties implement all activities from planning, construction, maintenance, and operation the facilities for the duration that has been agreed. Thirdly, there are transitions of risks from the government to the private sectors. With the implementation of planning until the operation of infrastructure, the risks are attached to the private party. The government does not bear any risks especially financial lost for the implementation of infrastructure development and operation. Fourthly, private parties responsible to finance the construction and maintenance of the facilities. Projects financing may obtain from several sources, especially the capital market and banking. Fifthly, the private party gains benefit from asset operations. Private involvement in infrastructure is for profit-seeking purposes by build and manage public infrastructure. Sales and payment systems in PPP are made through two systems: payment based on availability charge or user-by-charge usage charge. The scheme of payment system is based on the agreement between the government and the private sectors.

Research Methods and the Charateristics of PPP

The research method in this study uses qualitative and quantitative research methods that have been carried out by (Abadi et al., 2021; Aliyyah et al., 2021; Juanamasta et al., 2019; Kalbuana & Prasetyo, et al., 2021; Kalbuana & Suryati, et al., 2021; Luwihono et al., 2021; Prabowo et al., 2020; Prasetyo, Aliyyah, Rusdiyanto & Nartasari, et al., 2021b, 2021a; Prasetyo, Aliyyah, Rusdiyanto & Suprapti, et al., 2021; Prasetyo et al., 2021, 2021; Prasetyo, Aliyyah, Rusdiyanto & Chamariah, et al., 2021; Rusdiyanto et al., 2021; Rusdiyanto & Agustia, et al., 2020; Rusdiyanto & Hidayat, et al., 2020; Rusdiyanto & Karman, et al., 2020; Shabbir et al., 2021; Susanto et al., 2021)

The provisions of infrastructures are identified as a state action in providing public facilities. Traditionally, the government carries out this provision. The government, currently, do not dominate infrastructure development. The private sectors involve in the development and operationalization of facilities for the community. This PPP model is very different from the more dominant models so far such as the traditional procurement and privatization. The differences between PPP and the traditional procurement are as follows. The legal relationship between the government and the private sectors in traditional procurement is limited to the implementation of the design and construction of infrastructure that is governed by a design-build (DB) agreement (Grimsey & Lewis, 2007). Private sectors build and the government finance and operate the infrastructure facilities. This is different from the PPP model that private sectors carry out activities of Design-Build-Finance-Operate-Maintain (DBFOM) of facilities. The facilities will be returned to the government within a certain time frame as stipulated in the agreement.

Public Private Partnerships (PPP) also differs from privatization. Based on the Indonesian law, the concept of privatization is known as transfers of assets or equities from the state-owned enterprises (SoE) to the private sectors (Yescombe, 2007). The definition of privatization can be found in the Law No. 19 of 2003 concerning State Owned Enterprise (hereinafter abbreviated as ‘Law of SoE’). In Article 1 Point 12 affirms that privatization as a result of the sale of shares of SoE either partially or wholly to the private party. The objective of privatization is to improve the performance or value of the company, increase benefits for the state and society, and share ownership to public.

Privatization as a transfer of assets is regulated in the Law No. 1/2004 concerning State Treasury and the Government Regulation No. 27 of 2014 concerning The Management of State/Local Property as the implementing regulation. This Government Regulation stipulates that the transfer of properties owned by state or regional government is classified privatization. The properties include the properties purchased or obtained at the expense of state or regional budgets and other legally obtained from grants or the like, properties obtained as execution of agreements, properties obtained in accordance with the provisions of statutory regulations, or properties obtained under a court decision which has permanent legal force. In the PPP scheme, there is no action of transferring asset or equities from state to private sectors.

Indonesian PPP Laws

The initial enactment of the Indonesian PPP law was the Presidential Decree No. 7 of 1998 concerning Public-Private Partnership in Development and/or Infrastructure Management (hereinafter referred to as 'Presidential Decree 7/1998') in 1998. By Presidential Decree No. 67 of 2005 on Government Cooperation with Infrastructure Business Entities the President Decree (7/1998) was declared null and void ('Presidential Decree 67/2005'). The Presidential Regulation was replaced with the Presidential Regulation No 38 of 2015 on cooperation between government and businesses in infrastructure supply ('Presidential Decree 38/2015'), hereinafter abbreviated. Presidential Decree 7/1998 only regulated the development of economic infrastructures. The social infrastructures have not been regulated in the Presidential Decree until the enactment of Presidential Regulation 67/2005. Economic and social infrastructures remain as part of Presidential Regulation 38/2015.

Presidential Regulation 38/2015 affirms five objectives of the Public Private Partnerships (PPP) (Presidential Regulation 38/2015). Firstly, Public Private Partnerships (PPP) aims to provide for sustainable financing in the provision of infrastructure through the mobilization of private funds. Secondly, Public Private Partnerships (PPP) aims to realisation the provision of infrastructures with certain quality, effective, efficient, targeted, and timely. Third, the Public Private Partnerships (PPP) is committed to fostering private sector participation in infrastructure provision based upon sound corporate principles. Fourth, Public Private Partnerships (PPP) encourages the use or consideration of the ability of users to pay for services received. Fifthly, Public Private Partnerships (PPP) ensures that private sector investment in infrastructure delivery by means of the government payments mechanism to the private sector will be returned on a regular basis.

The principles of Public Private Partnerships (PPP) adopted by the Presidential Regulation 38/2015 are as follows (Presidential Regulation 38/2015). Firstly, the principle of partnership is the cooperation between the government and the private sector based on the legislation and considers the needs of both parties. Secondly, the principle of use is the provision of government and private sector infrastructure that provides the community with social and economic benefits. Thirdly, the fair competition principle is the procurement of business entity conducted through fair, open, and transparent. Fourthly, the risk control and management principle states that infrastructure provision is based on risk assessment, management strategy development and mitigation. Fifthly, the principle of efficiency of cooperation in infrastructure provision can accelerate development and enhance service quality and infrastructure maintenance. And the sixth principle is the efficiency principle that infrastructure cooperation is sufficient to meet sustainable financing requirements, and that the private sector provides infrastructure financing.

Risk in PPP Projects

Risks always exist in every provision of infrastructure facility. These risks cannot be avoided but managed and minimized in order to reduce any losses in the process of the development and operational of the infrastructures. The risks of PPP projects are divided into two types of risks, which are risks based on levels and the risks that evolve during or after the construction phase. Based on the level, the risks in projects are divided into three levels, which are macro, meso, and micro (Edwards & Hardcastle, 2005, pp. 25-35). Macro level risks are the external factors that can affect PPP projects. These external factors can be political, state, legal, economic, social changes. The concrete forms of macro risk are unstable government, takeover or asset nationalization, poor public decision-making process, and strong political opposition. Natural factors are also categorized in macro-level risk. weather changes and natural disasters are risks that can occur and may affect the activities of Public Private Partnerships (PPP) projects.

Meso level risks are risks those arise within a Public Private Partnerships (PPP) projects. The types of risks relate to the location, design, construction, and technology of the Public Private Partnerships (PPP) projects and the demand or use of the products of the projects. The concrete form of meso level risk is land acquisition, financial availability and investor appeal to the project, project approval and licensing delays, unrecovered engineering techniques, high construction costs, construction delays, availability of materials and labours, changes designs that cause delay, poor quality of work, bankruptcy or contractual failure of subcontractors or suppliers, high asset development or maintenance costs, low incomes, and other factors that may affect the implementation of Public Private Partnerships (PPP) projects.

Micro-level risks are same as meso, which are coming from within the projects. The difference is the meso risk associated with the project and the micro risk related to the relationship between the parties of the projects. These risks occur in the procurement process of business entity and interpretation of the agreement between the parties. These forms of risk are related to the organization and coordination between government and private parties, inadequate experience in projects, the distribution of responsibilities and their risks and insufficient authority, different methods of work and knowledge among parties, and the lack of commitment from both parties.

The risks of Public Private Partnerships (PPP) based on the phases are divided into two phases: pre-completion risk and post-completion risk (Gatti, 2020). Pre-completion risk is a risk faced within the construction stage of infrastructure. While post-completion risk is a risk that may occur during the operational phase of infrastructure or after the development phase ends. Some risks also arise in both the pre-completion and post-completion stages. The pre- completion risks include planning risk, technological risk, and construction risk. The risk of planning activities is the risk that occurs when infrastructure development is not in accordance with the planned schedule due to the availability of fund. Technology risk is changing of technology of construction.

A risk facing contractors. At the time of construction stage, contractor plan to use a certain technology agreed between the contractor and the business entity. Changes in conditions lead to a technological change in the process. The consequence is the delay in completion of infrastructure development. The construction risk is a postponement of the completion. This risk is due to several factors including, among others, the cost of a swollen construction, the delay of completion, the settlement resulting from performance inefficiency, and coercive conditions.

The main risks faced in the post-completion phase relate to the supply of raw materials, production risk, and market risk. Problems of raw materials can be less quantity or quality that affect the production. Another problem is the price of raw materials turns higher than previous estimation that affecting production costs. Change in production costs will affect the selling price of the product. Another risk in post-completion is production risk. This risk occurs when the function of facilities underperforms than the initial projections. It comes from discrepancy between planning and operations on facilities may lead to production inefficiency. Technically the asset that becomes the production tool has decreased performance. The result is that production is not optimal and affects output. The last risk is market risk. Market has changed due to the availability of other options of infrastructure. In addition, there are also risks that appear in both pre-completion and post-completion. The types of risks that arise in both phases are the macro level risks of external factors that affect the development and operationalization of PPP projects.

Substantive and Formal Rules of PPP Projects

Infrastructure development deals with various forms of risks. These risks can be risks in major, meso, or minor classifications. Risk may also occur in the phase of pre completion and post completion. In this circumstance, law has a significant role to manage and reduce the risks. Taylor argues that law is a tool for managing risk. The role of law is on substantive and formal rules (Michael R. Taylor, 1984). The role of substantive rule in managing risk of Public Private Partnerships (PPP) is as a standard to assess the subject, object, and legal relationship in Public Private Partnerships (PPP) based on scientific study. Science, however, has more than one assessment methods and the law must adopt one of these methods (Michael Taylor, 1984). The standard also determines the value of benefits of projects that are assessed in addition to the risks (Michael Taylor, 1984).

The substantive rules are as a part of formal rules that the later govern the decision making process (Michael Taylor, 1984). Formal rules govern the procedures to be performed when making policies. In Public Private Partnerships (PPP), there are procedures implemented in several stages against the objects and subjects involved in PPP and legal relations between the parties. Based on the formal Indonesian Public Private Partnerships (PPP) rules, there are three stages that must be fulfilled. These stages that must be taken in Public Private Partnerships (PPP) are: (i) planning and preparation PPP projects; (ii) procurement of business entity; and (iii) contracts to ensure certainty between the government and the private sector in the PPP. The implementation of these three stages, there are standards that are substantive and must be fulfilled. The purpose of implementing these steps is to produce an objective assessment of the objective Public Private Partnerships (PPP) project as well as the appropriate business entity.

Planning and Preparation PPP Projects

The first phase of the PPP process is the initial identification and feasibility carried out by the government. This stage is useful to know whether or not worthy of infrastructure development plan. The feasibility consists of investment financing feasibility, return on investment, and project development process. The identification phase of infrastructure provision should consider five points. First, the projects are initiated in accordance with the national or regional development plan and the infrastructure sector strategic plan. Secondly, the projects should be in based on the spatial plan. Thirdly, infrastructure projects have linkages between infrastructure and inter-regional sectors. Fourthly, the project should be examined by benefit and social cost analysis. Fifthly, the infrastructure to be built should be reviewed by value for money analysis. Five considerations mentioned above, the first to third aspects are based on the national and regional policies on infrastructure development. The fourth and fifth aspects are more focused on micro risk approach directly related to infrastructure projects. The purpose of objective study with scientific methodology is to identify the benefit, social influence, and value for money of the project.

This aspect of benefit and social is carried out with the benefit-cost analysis method. BCA predicts the feasibility of the project based on the comparison between the benefits to the community and the costs to be expanded by the community. In contrast to the analysis of value for money with a more quantitative method leads to the financial aspect. The purpose of this study is to estimate the overall financial impact of the project, consideration of operating costs and risk costs, and net present value.

The result of the initial feasibility resulted in seven standards. The seven standards are stipulated in Article 30 Paragraph (2) Presidential Regulation 38/2015 namely: (i) source of financing; (ii) identification of contractual, regulatory and institutional frameworks; (iii) technical design; (iv) proposals of support and government guarantees; (v) identification of risks and mitigation recommendations, and the allocation of risks; and (vii) the return on investment of the executing agency.

Procurement of Business Entity

In the Head of Government Procurement Policy, Regulation No 19 of 2015 on procedures for the implementation and implementation of state-owned companies in cooperation with business entities in the provision of infrastructure (hereinafter referred to as the GPPA 19/2015) is laid down the stage of procurement of business entities within PPP for Infrastructure. The procurement of business entities carries out by the procurement committee established by the government. This committee has a role and responsibility to prepare and implement the procurement process to select the business entity.

The steps undertaken by the Executing Committee is divided into two namely the preparation and implementation. In this preparation stage, the procurement committee conducted five important activities. First, the procurement committee must confirm the readiness of the Public Private Partnerships (PPP) project by reviewing the completeness of the document or the readiness of the Public Private Partnerships (PPP) project to proceed to the procurement phase. Second, the procurement committee confirms the interest of the market to identify the certainty of the interest of the market to the project by reviewing the market sounding results that have been done before by the government or conducting a discussion in the forum business entity. Thirdly, the procurement committee prepares the schedule for the procurement of the business entity and the draft announcement. Fourthly, the procurement committee prepares and stipulates the procurement documents of the business entity consisting of the Prequalification Document and Proposal Request Document. Lastly, the procurement committee manages the data and information space for the purposes of due diligence. Participants who pass the prequalification and have submitted a confidentiality letter are granted access to data rooms containing documents related to PPP projects, procurement documents, and copies of documents relating to the procurement of business entity distributed to participants.

The second stage is the procurement process of the Public Private Partnerships (PPP) business entity. This stage is divided into two phases, which are prequalification, and election. The prequalification includes prequalification announcement activities, registration and taking of prequalification documents, explanation of Public Private Partnerships (PPP) projects, scope of activities of Public Private Partnerships (PPP) project implementers and prequalification documentation, prequalification participants including qualification documents, qualification evaluation, stipulation and announcement of qualification results and qualification rebuttal. Prequalification participants will be assessed on administrative requirements, technical skills, and financial capabilities. If a business entity passes prequalification more than one then the procurement stage is executed by auction. If only one participant who passes the assessment will be followed by direct appointment.

Auction of election of Public Private Partnerships (PPP) business entity is classified in two forms: one-stage auction and two-stage auction. The differences between the two auction forms are as follows. One-stage auctions when: (i) specifications of infrastructure provision can be clearly defined; or (ii) does not require discussion of technical optimization in order to achieve optimal output. Unlike the two-stage auction which: (i) the specification of the provision of infrastructure cannot be formulated with certainty because there are variations of innovation and technology; and (ii) require the optimization of technical bidding in order to achieve optimal output.

Direct appointments may also be made if the Public Private Partnerships (PPP) is for a particular condition or there is only one participant who passes the prequalification stage. The criteria of certain conditions underlying the direct appointment are: (i) the development of infrastructure already built and/or operated by the same business entity; (ii) work that can only be carried out with the use of new technologies and service providers capable of applying the sole; or (iii) the business entity has controlled most or all of the land required for the implementation of the PPP.

Public Private Partnerships (PPP) Contract

Every Public Private Partnerships (PPP) is required by a government-private sector cooperation agreement. As regulated in Article 32 Paragraph (1) of Presidential Regulation 38/2015, the government has an obligation to prepare cooperation agreement draft. Article 32 Paragraph (2) mentions the minimum standards of clauses in the cooperation agreement. In addition, in Indonesian law also regulates clauses contained in the contract particularly relating to assets, rights and obligations that arise in relation to assets, namely: (i) the purpose of asset utilization and the prohibition to utilize assets for purposes other than which has been agreed upon; (ii) operational and maintenance responsibilities, including payments of taxes and other liabilities arising from the use of assets; (iii) the rights and obligations of the party who controls the asset to supervise and maintain the asset's performance during its use; (iv) a prohibition for the business entity to pledge assets as collateral to the third parties; (v) the procedure for the delivery and/or return of assets; and (vi) other matters in accordance with the provisions of legislation.

The cooperation agreement also governs matters relating to assets. The clauses governing the assets are: (i) the condition of the assets to be transferred; (ii) asset transfer procedures; (iii) asset status is not as collateral; (iv) asset status free from third party claims; and (v) the exemption of the government from any claims arising after the transfer of the assets. In the circumstance that the project uses Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) then this shall also be stipulated in the agreement. There are three things that must be regulated in connection with intellectual property rights. First, the intellectual property used is completely free from all forms of lawlessness. Secondly, the government shall be exempt from any claim from any third party relating to the use of (IPR) in the provision of infrastructure. Thirdly, the provision of infrastructure can still be implemented and the use of (IPR) may continue despite the claim or demand for (IPR).

Referring to international best practice and statutory provisions applicable in Indonesia, the characteristics of Public Private Partnerships (PPP) agreement is general. The substance of the agreement is made general and avoids the rigid nature and does not set specific and technical provisions. This occurs because the PPP cooperation agreement is a long-term agreement. Characteristic of long-term agreement is cannot be made in detail. The performance of agreement will deal with unforeseen circumstances and changes that will affect the implementation of the agreement itself. Therefore, the agreement will be made incomplete which is different from the complete contract in which the parties specify in detail the rights and obligations attached to each party.

This long-term agreement will deal with changing circumstances, especially external conditions that affect the implementation of the contract (Hviid, 2000). Therefore, contracts on PPP need to be made to anticipate future conditions that cannot be predicted. Although made in general but the agreement does not lose the analytical content of rights and obligations. The analytical aspect that becomes a tool to ensure legal certainty in the PPP cooperation agreement is framed in a commitment that contains the achievements that must be performed. The consequences of the character inherent in the PPP cooperation agreement as an incomplete contract is used as theoretical approach in the design and performance of the agreement. In the science of contract law, the theory of promise dominates the frame of mind in creating and analysing a covenant. This theory, however, is not suitable to be the foundation on long-term contracts due to the simplification the meaning of the agreement itself. Promise theory has disadvantage and inappropriate to be applied to PPP contracts due to the reason that promise is a simplification of a complex legal relationship, (Lightsey, 1984). Cooperation agreement on PPP does not regulate specific and predictable legal relationships. Macro, meso, and micro risks may occur and affect the performance of the contract.

Therefore, the Public Private Partnerships (PPP) cooperation agreement is more appropriate using the theory of exchange relationship theory. Based on this theory, the performance of contract is constructed at aspects of the relationship between the government and the private sector and not merely rights and obligations that must be implemented rigidly. Exchange relationship is defined broadly including the willing and things those are not regulated but become part of the commitment and the willing of the parties in the frame of the purposes contained in the contract.

Conclusion

Public Private Partnerships (PPP) is an infrastructure development scheme involving the private sector. The objective is to meet the needs of public facilities but to the extent of insufficient funding problems from the state budget. Risks would arise during the provision of infrastructure facilities. Law becomes a tool to mitigate such risks. Formal and substantive laws serve as appropriate mechanisms for reducing risk. Indonesian Public Private Partnerships (PPP) laws have been regulated comprehensively to provide certainty and predictability for the provision of infrastructure through PPP mechanisms.

The formal law regulates that the provision of infrastructure must follow through three stages from project planning and preparation, selection of business entities through procurement processes, and legal arrangements between government and the private sector in the agreement. In the formal process, there are substantive aspects that must be implemented to obtain objective results. Assessment objectivity is inherent in project planning and preparation based on scientific studies, transparent and fair selection of business entity, and flexible legal arrangements to adapt to changes at the operational stage of infrastructure facilities.

References

1. Abadi, S., Endarto, B., Taufiqurrahman, A.R.B., Kurniawan, W., Daim, N.A., Ismono, J., … & Kalbuana, N. (2021). Indonesian desirious finality of the community in regard. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 24(Special Issue 1), 1–10.
2. Aliyyah, N., Prasetyo, I., Rusdiyanto, R., Endarti, E.W., Mardiana, F., Winarko, R., … & Tjaraka, H. (2021). What affects employee performance through work motivation? Journal of Management Information and Decision Sciences, 24, 1–14.
3. Article 3 the Presidential Regulation 38/2015
4. Article 4 the Presidential Regulation 38/2015
5. Bhattacharya, Amar, Jeremy, O., & Nicholas, S. (2015). Driving sustainable development through better infrastructure: Key elements of a transformation program. Global economy and development working paper, 91, 8
6. Darrin, G., & Mervyn, L. (2007). Public private partnerships and public procurement. Agenda, 14(2), 171-188.
7. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank. (2017). Mobilizing islamic finance for infrastructure public private partnerships, Report, 10
8. Juanamasta, I.G., Wati, N.M.N., Hendrawati, E., Wahyuni, W., Pramudianti, M., Wisnujati, N.S., … & Umanailo, M.C.B. (2019). The role of customer service through Customer Relationship Management (CRM) to increase customer loyalty and good image. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 8(10), 2004–2007.
9. Kalbuana, N., Prasetyo, B., Asih, P., Arnas, Y., Simbolon, S.L., Abdusshomad, A., … & Mahdi, F.M. (2021). Earnings management is affected by firm size, leverage and roa: Evidence from Indonesia. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 20(SpecialIssue 2), 1–12.
10. Kalbuana, N., Suryati, A., Rusdiyanto, R., Azwar, A., Rudy, R., Yohana, Y., … & Hidayat, W. (2021). Interpretation of sharia accounting practices in Indonesia. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 24, 1–12.
11. Luwihono, A., Suherman, B., Sembiring, D., Rasyid, S., Kalbuana, N., Saputro, R., … & Asih, P. (2021). Macroeconomic effect on stock price: Evidence from Indonesia. Accounting, 7(5), 1189–1202.
12. The Law 40/2007 concerning Limited Liability Company governs this business entity.
13. Li Bing, A., Akintoye, P.J., Edwards, C. (2005). Hardcastle, The allocation of risk in PPP/PFI construction projects in the UK. International Journal of Project Managemet, 23, 25-35.
14. Michael, R.T. (1984). The role of law in risk management: A framework for managing uncertainty. Fundamental and applied toxicology, 4, 408-417.
15. Morten, H. (2000). Long term contracts and relational contracts, in Gerrit De Geest (edistion). Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, III, Elgar, Washington.
16. National Development Planning Agency. (2017). Public private partnerships: Infrastructure projects plan in Indonesia, vi
17. Prabowo, B., Rochmatulaili, E., Rusdiyanto, & Sulistyowati, E. (2020). Corporate governance and its impact in company’s stock price: Case study, 25(Extra 10), 187–196.
18. Prasetyo, I., Aliyyah, N., Rusdiyanto, Chamariah, Syahrial, R., Nartasari, D.R., … & Sulistiyowati. (2021). Discipline and work environment affect employee productivity: Evidence from Indonesia. International Journal of Entrepreneurship, 25(5).
19. Prasetyo, I., Aliyyah, N., Rusdiyanto, Kalbuana, N., & Rochman, A.S. (2021). Corporate social responsibility practices in islamic studies in Indonesian. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 24(Special Issue 1), 1–15.
20. Prasetyo, I., Aliyyah, N., Rusdiyanto, Nartasari, D.R., Nugroho, S., Rahmawati, Y., … & Rochman, A.S. (2021a). Impact financial performance to stock prices: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 24, 1–11.
21. Prasetyo, I., Aliyyah, N., Rusdiyanto, R., Nartasari, D.R., Nugroho, S., Rahmawati, Y., … & Rochman, A.S. (2021b). What affects audit delay in Indonesia? Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 27, 1–15.
22. Prasetyo, I., Aliyyah, N., Rusdiyanto, Suprapti, S., Kartika, C., Winarko, R., … & Al-asqolaini, M.Z. (2021). Performance is affected by leadership and work culture: A case study from Indonesia. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 20(Special Issue), 1–15.
23. Prasetyo, I., Aliyyah, N., Rusdiyanto, Tjaraka, H., Kalbuana, N., & Rochman, A.S. (2021). Vocational training has an influence on employee career development: A case study Indonesia. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 20(2), 1–14.
24. Rusdiyanto, Agustia, D., Soetedjo, S., & Septiarini, D.F. (2020). The effect of cash turnover and receivable turnover on profitability. Opcion, 36(Special Ed), 1417–1432.
25. Rusdiyanto, Hidayat, W., Bahari, C., Susetyorini, Elan, U., Indrawati, M., … & Gazali. (2021). Company profitability is influenced by sales and administration & amp; General costs: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 24.
26. Rusdiyanto, Hidayat, W., Tjaraka, H., Septiarini, D.F., Fayanni, Y., Utari, W., … & Imanawati, Z. (2020). The effect of earning per share, debt to equity ratio and return on assets on stock prices: Case study Indonesian. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 26(2), 1–10.
27. Rusdiyanto, R., Karman, J., Toyib, H.A., Muli, P.A., Tambunan, F., & Hutahaean, J. (2020). Analysis of decision support systems on recommended sales of the best ornamental plants by type. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1566(1).
28. National Mid-Term Development Plan. (2015-2019), point 6-85
29. Shabbir, M.S., Mahmood, A., Setiawan, R., Nasirin, C., Rusdiyanto, R., Gazali, G., … & Batool, F. (2021). Closed-loop supply chain network design with sustainability and resiliency criteria. Environmental Science and Pollution Research.
30. Stefano, G. (2008). Project finance in theory and practice, Elsevier, USA.
31. Susanto, H., Prasetyo, I., Indrawati, T., Aliyyah, N., Rusdiyanto, Tjaraka, H., … & Zainurrafiqi. (2021). The impacts of earnings volatility, net income and comprehensive income on share price: Evidence from Indonesia stock exchange. Accounting, 7(5), 1009–1016.
32. Taylor states four variables to lessen the risks which are substantive rules for decision making, procedural rules, activities aimed at enforcing substantive rules, and judicial involvement in the decision making process. This article, however, uses substantive and formal rules as variables to identify the PPP laws that mitigate the risks in PPP projects.
33. World Bank. (2004). Public private partnership reference guide version 2.0, Washington.
34. Wallace, K.L. (1984). A critique of the promise model of contract. William and mary law review, 26(45).
35. Yescombe, E.R. (2007). Public private partnership. Elsevier, Great Britain.