Author(s): Ali Mohammad Adaileh
This paper orchestrates the qualities of university rankings that cause pressing factor or badgering on universities and investigations potential procedures for activity that can be done in the genuine setting of the three fundamental university rankings (QS, THE, ARWU), proposing the ramifications for the alleged world-class universities and others (which address 95% of the aggregate). Despite the fact that there is debate over the standards of the university ranking frameworks, numerous universities are setting up methodologies pointed toward adjusting to these rules and markers and advancing their positions. This review infers that global university rankings ought not be a significant wellspring of data to consider the nature of universities since this can adversely affect the improvement of medium-and long-term arrangements in higher education and the actual universities. Universities should focus on their mission and should give legitimate and dependable data to all stakeholders about the degree of accomplishment of their objectives.