Journal of Organizational Culture, Communications and Conflict (Print ISSN: 1544-0508; Online ISSN: 1939-4691 )

Short communication: 2021 Vol: 25 Issue: 6

Alternative Dispute Resolution in Academic Publishing

Laura Sandra, University of the Azores

Citation Information: Sandra, L. (2021). Alternative dispute resolution in academic publishing. Journal of Organizational Culture Communications and Conflict, 25(6), 1-2

Mediation and arbitration (e.g., med-arb) samples of different dispute resolution. They’re “alternative” within the sense they're not resolved in courts. Different dispute resolution can be a valuable suggests that for resolution authorship disputes that bypasses judicial proceeding.

A major distinction between screenwriting and science is that Hollywood screenwriters are a part of one unionized manpower, whereas scientists lack any such central authority to compel them to hunt arbitration or mediation. In cases wherever all authors were at an equivalent establishment, associate institutional committee, or analysis ethics consultants may offer mediation. However the sole authority that might be relevant to all or any authors of a manuscript, notwithstanding institutional affiliation, is that the journal’s editorial employees. Authors implicitly acknowledge this authority once they submit a manuscript. However as mentioned higher than, implicit authority alone doesn't mean editors are well positioned to perform arbitration or mediation. Rather, arbitration or mediation ought to be conducted not by editors, however by freelance agencies (e.g., committees, businesses, nongovernmental organizations, analysis ethics consultants) that focus on different dispute resolution. These organizations would be staffed by individuals of various backgrounds World Health Organization are fully fledged with scientific commercial enterprise, investigation, and dispute resolution. These agencies may well be operated by a publisher, a journal, an establishment, or a scientific society, however be freelance from the editorial team, like the ethics committees or journalists functioning at scientific journals. Dispute resolution agencies might offer services to several journals, not only 1. During this model, editors would facilitate a method of different dispute resolution, not conduct it.

The understood recognition of editorial authority can be created specific. For instance, once a journal accepts a paper, the editors might need authors to sign a kind agreeing that by having this paper printed during this journal, they might have binding arbitration if a dispute arises. Several journals have already got such processes in situ for copyright transference, payment of page charges or open access fees, and so on. Mandated arbitration poses potential moral issues, thus journals might not need to create arbitration a demand for publication. Instead, journals might advocate mediation or arbitration given that disputes arise. Authors’ voluntarily agreeing to arbitration or mediation doesn't threaten freedom. If the authors failed to conform to binding arbitration, or mediation fails, the authors would be liberal to resolve the matter internally among a group time or face an editor’s call by act. The key purpose is that “work it out by yourselves” becomes in an exceedingly many choices for authors in a dispute, not the sole choice.

The simplest situation is one within which a dispute arises once a paper has been submitted to a journal. Looking on the journal’s specific policy, journal employees would either advocate mediation or arbitration, or just initiate the method by contacting the choice dispute resolution agency. As a result of different dispute resolution methods are available several forms journals may take issue in what dispute resolution process they like. For papers that have already been printed, however, some variety of resolution as well as arbitration may well be a lot of acceptable than mediation alone as a result of associate editor must build a call a couple of paper’s version of record. The mediators or arbiters would investigate, applying the commonly accepted practices of the sphere, which might be famous to authors prior to. For instance, in life sciences, it'd be expected that the author World Health Organization performed the foremost tasks would be 1st author, and therefore the author with the best seniority would be last. Whereas authors could overestimate their own work, individuals engaged in hand resolution in any field are habitually tasked with creating selections wherever participants provide contradictory data (e.g., judges and juries in court). A mediation or arbitration method may well be similar in some ways that to a review system. There is also multiple mediators or arbiters World Health Organization investigate the claims and facts of the dispute, maybe with some specifically assigned to act as advocates for the various people, like prosecution and defence attorneys in court. The choice dispute resolution committee or agency would deliver recommendations to the journal’s editor-in-chief, World Health Organization would implement the choice.


  1. Duffy, M.A. (2017). Last and corresponding authorship practices in ecology. Ecology and evolution, 7(21), 8876-8887.
  2. Pignatelli, B., Maisonneuve, H., & Chapuis, F. (2005). Authorship ignorance: views of researchers in French clinical settings. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31(10), 578-581.
  3. Strange, K. (2008). Authorship: why not just toss a coin?. American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology
Get the App