INTRODUCTION In today’s interconnected economy, businesses increasingly engage in cross-border transactions—whether through exporting goods, investing in foreign markets, or forming international partnerships. While these ventures offer lucrative opportunities, they also expose companies to a host of legal complexities. Navigating the legal terrain of international trade and investment requires a deep understanding of diverse regulatory systems, bilateral treaties, and global standards. Each country has its own set of laws governing imports, exports, foreign direct investment (FDI), labor, and environmental standards. Companies must comply with: Tariffs, import quotas, and documentation requirements. Safety, labeling, and certification rules. Limits on foreign ownership or sector-specific controls. Failure to comply can result in fines, delays, or revocation of business licenses. For example, India’s FDI policy restricts foreign investment in multi-brand retail, while the U.S. enforces strict export controls on dual-use technologies (Andriyani, 2017). Cross-border disputes may arise from contract breaches, intellectual property violations, or regulatory conflicts. Choosing the right forum and legal system is critical. Preferred for neutrality and enforceability under the New York Convention. May be biased or slow, especially in jurisdictions with weak rule of law. Useful for preserving business relationships. Dispute resolution clauses in contracts should specify governing law, jurisdiction, and arbitration rules to avoid ambiguity (Attamimi, 1990). Multinational enterprises face complex tax obligations across jurisdictions. Key issues include: Income taxed in both home and host countries. Pricing of intra-group transactions must comply with OECD guidelines to prevent profit shifting. Bilateral agreements can reduce tax burdens and clarify obligations. Navigating international tax law requires expert advice and careful structuring to avoid penalties and audits (Ferejohn et al., 2004). Protecting patents, trademarks, and copyrights across borders is challenging due to inconsistent enforcement and piracy risks. Registering IP in each jurisdiction. Using international treaties like the Madrid Protocol and TRIPS Agreement. Including IP clauses in contracts and licensing agreements. In emerging markets, weak enforcement and counterfeit goods pose significant threats to brand integrity and innovation (Isra, 2019). Political instability, regulatory changes, and expropriation can jeopardize foreign investments. Legal systems may lack transparency or favor domestic entities. Offered by agencies like MIGA (World Bank). Provide investor protections and dispute resolution mechanisms. Can reduce exposure and enhance compliance. To ease cross-border business, international organizations and trade blocs promote legal harmonization: Such as the EU Single Market, ASEAN Economic Community, and USMCA, streamline regulations and reduce barriers. Despite progress, legal fragmentation remains a challenge, especially for small and medium enterprises (SMEs) entering foreign markets. To navigate legal challenges effectively, companies should: Conduct thorough legal due diligence before entering new markets (Kusnardi et al., 1994). CONCLUSION Cross-border business offers immense potential—but only for those prepared to navigate its legal intricacies. From regulatory compliance to dispute resolution, the legal landscape is as diverse as the markets themselves. By understanding and addressing these challenges, companies can unlock global opportunities while safeguarding their interests and reputation.

References

Baldry, S., Steingröver, M., & Hessler, M. A. (2014). The rise of OTT players: What is the appropriate regulatory response?.

Indexed at, Google Scholar

Bowrey, K., & Handler, M. (Eds.). (2014). Law and Creativity in the Age of the Entertainment Franchise (No. 27). Cambridge University Press.

Indexed at, Google Scholar

Debnath, T. (2021). The Rise of Content Comercialized on OTT Platforms and Copyright Laws: An Analysis. Law Essentials J., 2, 110.

Google Scholar

Galway, A. J. (2005). Copyright law, digital technology and the future of entertainment.

Google Scholar

Kramarsky, S. M. (2001). Copyright enforcement in the internet age: The law and technology of digital rights management. DePaul-LCA J. Art & Ent. L., 11, 1.

Indexed at, Google Scholar

Nijhawan, G. S., & Dahiya, S. (2020). Role of COVID as a Catalyst in increasing adoption of OTTs in India: A Study of evolving consumer consumption patterns and future business scope. Journal of Content, Community and Communication, 12(6), 298-311.

Indexed at, Google Scholar

Sihombing, A. K., Permata, R. R., & Ramli, T. S. (2021). Comparison of Digital Copyright Protection on Over the Top (OTT) Streaming Content Media in Indonesia and the United States. Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8(2), 183-212.

Indexed at, Google Scholar

Singh, A. (2022). Interplay of the Growing Digital Media and Entertainment Industry with Competition Laws. Supremo Amicus, 30, 502.

Google Scholar

Unni, V. K. (2015). Indian copyright law and anti-circumvention provisions: can a please-all regime meet the global yardsticks?. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 10(5), 336-343.

Indexed at, Google Scholar

Vogel, H. L. (2014). Entertainment industry economics: A guide for financial analysis. Cambridge university press.

Indexed at, Google Scholar

Received: 02-Aug -2025 Manuscript No. JLERI -25-15611; Editor assigned: 03-Aug -2025 Pre QC No. JLERI -25-15611(PQ); Reviewed: 17-Aug -2025 QC No. JLERI-25-15611; Revised: 21-Aug -2025 Manuscript No. JLERI-25-15611(R); Published: 28-Aug -2025