Academy of Strategic Management Journal (Print ISSN: 1544-1458; Online ISSN: 1939-6104)

Research Article: 2018 Vol: 17 Issue: 6

Factors that affect Students Decision to Choose Private Universities in Medan City Indonesia

Rahmat Hidayat, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Manajemen Sukma

Effendi Sinuhaji, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Manajemen

Widyaningrum, Universitas Nahdlatul Wathan Mataram

Erdiansyah, Universitas PGRI Palembang

Adrianto, Universitas Terbuka

Keywords

School Tuition, Brand Image, Facility, Students, Decision, Confirmatory Factory Analysis.

Introduction

every new school year, universities in Indonesia are involved in the registration of new students. State Universities attract new students more easily than Private Universities. Various efforts have been made by Private Universities in Indonesia, especially in Medan City to attract the attention of prospective new students. It is no secret that there are a high number of private institutions that get little number of students. This is influenced by several factors such as public perception on the quality of education, the amount of school tuition (Shammot, 2011), the availability of facilities, facilities and infrastructure. Meanwhile, other factor such as the atmosphere conductive learning is also considered as one important factor to choose a university (Kitsawad, 2013). Other research factors that influence the interest of prospective students in choosing tertiary institutions is the factors that determine the decision of school graduates in choosing higher education studies, namely educational factors (in the family: education style, in school: teacher recommendations and career guidance), information factors (open, exhibitions, mass media), economic factors (study fee, career prospects), and other factors (geographical location, ranking, personal and demographic) (Eidimtas & Juceviciene, 2014). Other research results suggest that some factors that influence prospective students choose colleges are because of parents and friends suggestions, job opportunities, well-structured programs, quality of teaching, socialization, and flexibility in requirements (Ryan et al., 2014). The results of subsequent studies stated that the study program offered, qualified lecturers, flexible lecture schedules, student and staff relations, and campus environment influenced the choice of prospective students to continue their education degree, besides this study also found students' dissatisfaction with weak policies, study programs offered in each semester (Fosu & Poku, 2014).

Preliminary research that has been conducted on private university students in Medan such as UMSU, UISU, UMA, Indonesian Methodist University, HKBP Nomensen University, Nusantara Muslim University, LP3I Medan Polytechnic, and several other PU indicate that several factors that influence students in choosing private universities are the physical condition, the city where the campus is located (Polat, 2012), quality of learning, fees, facilities, socialization and location (Padlee et al., 2010), and image or brand. The very large number of private universities and the changing demands of prospective students for the attributes and performance of the education services they get will stimulate an increase in the intensity of competition among private universities. Private universities are required to be able to implement the right marketing strategy by offering higher education services that are suitable for prospective students.

Literature Review

Cost is the cash value or cash equivalent purchased for goods and services that is expected to bring current or future benefits to the organization (Hansen & Mowen, 2011). Promotion is the process which the company creates value for customers and builds strong customer relationships to capture value from customers as return. A brand is a name, term, sign, symbol, design, or combination thereof, which identifies a product or service from a seller or group of sellers and distinguishes them from competitors (Kotler & Armstrong, 2014). Brand image describes the extrinsic nature of a product or service, including the ways in which brands try to meet the psychological or social needs of customers (Kotler & Keller, 2012). Meanwhile, motivation is a desire within a person that causes the person to act (Mathis & Jackson, 2011). Moreover, facilities are physical resources that are exists before a service can be offered to consumers (Tjiptono, 2006). Provision of facilities is very important to support services that are non-physical. In addition, decision making is an integration process that combines knowledge to evaluate two or more alternative behaviors, and choose one of them (Peter & Olson, 2010). This study is aimed to determine the factors that influence the decision of students to choose private universities in Medan.

Methodology

This research subject was students of private universities in Medan. The variables that were observed consist of education fee, promotion, brand image, motivation and facility as exogenous variable and student decision as endogen variable. Determination of the number of samples was used quota sampling that distributed to 150 students. The research data was obtained by survey, questionnaire and interview, then the data was tested by Confirmatory Factory Analysis (CFA) test or construct validity test (indicator) which measured whether the construct (indicator) was able or not reflecting the latent variable with the criterion of Critical Ratio (CR)>1.96 and Probability value (P)<0.05, and reliability test with criteria of construct reliability value of at least 0.7. The data analysis used factor test with regression weights and CFA, and the data processed with Amos 21 program. The feasibility test of the model used: (1) sample size of at least 5 times estimated parameters (Hair et al., 2010), (2) normality test with criteria critical ratio skewness ± 2.58 at the significance level of 0.01, and (3) goodness of fit test.

Results

The respondents as the object of this study were 150 people. Meanwhile, the distribution of respondents was distinguished by gender (Table 1), the origin of private universities (Table 2) and semesters (Table 3).

Table 1
Respondents Distribution Based On Gender
Gender Amount
Man 82
Woman 68
Total 150
Table 2
Respondents Distribution Based On Private Universities
Private University Amount
UMSU 20
UISU 22
UMN 20
UMA 22
UHN 20
STIM Sukma 23
Politeknik LP3I Medan 23
Total 150
Table 3
Respondent Distribution Based On Semester
Semester Amount
Semester II 60
Semester IV 50
Semester VI 40
Total 150

Validity test was done by constructing validity test, with C.R value criteria>1.96 and Probability value (P)<0.05. While the reliability test used the value of construct reliability, the cut-off value of the value of construct reliability was minimally 0.7 0 (Table 4).

Table 4
Test Results Of Validity And Reliability
Variable Construct C.R. P Construct reliability
x12 image School_tuition      
x11 image School_tuition 4.235 ***  
x22 image Promotion      
x21 image Promotion 4.562 ***  
x32 image Brand_image      
x31 image Brand_image 5.283 ***  
x42 image Motivation      
x41 image Motivation 7.532 ***  
x52 image Facilities      
x51 image Facilities 4.809 ***  
Students decision image School_tuition     0.873
Students decision image Promotion      
Students decision image Brand_image      
Students decision image Motivation      
Students decision image Motivation      

The results of the validity test shows that each construct has a value of C.R.>1.96 and Probability value (P)<0.05, which means that all constructs observed are valid and have good convergence. While the reliability test results shows that the latent variable has a value of 0.873, in the value of the cut reliability construct 0.7, which can be concluded that the latent variable is reliable.

The results of the questionnaire (Table 5) showed that the average respondents who answered agreed as much as 42% and answered strongly agree as 35%. This indicates that the respondents choose private campus because the quality of graduates that is no different with the campus of the country. In addition, respondents also have strong willingness to study. The status as a student now makes the respondents confident; the tuition fee is in line with the quality of the study program, and the cleanness and tidiness of study room on the campus.

Table 5
Recapitulation Of Respondents’ Response
No Statement Response Amount
Strongly Agree Agree Less Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
F % F % F % F % F %
1. X11 44 29 53 35 25 17 18 12 10 7 150
2. X12 44 29 73 49 19 13 8 5 6 4 150
3. X21 54 36 65 43 18 12 11 7 2 1 150
4. X22 38 25 68 45 36 24 8 5 0 0 150
5. X31 51 34 57 38 29 19 12 8 1 1 150
6. X32 46 31 59 39 25 17 15 10 5 3 150
7. X41 63 42 60 40 14 9 9 6 4 3 150
8. X42 47 31 77 51 19 13 5 3 2 1 150
9. X51 47 31 57 38 35 23 8 5 3 2 150
10. X52 52 35 73 49 23 15 2 1 0 0 150
11. Students decision 90 60 51 34 9 6 0 0 0 0 150
  Average (%)   35   42   15   6   2  

Respondents who answered on average voted less agree as much as 15%, disagree as much as 6% and strongly disagree as much as 2%, which indicates that respondents feel that private campus has not been known by many people. Also, there are still campuses that have not been able to compete with other private campus, and the private campus does not provide information about education through publication to the community. It can be observed that there are some still private campuses that do not provide information to the public through various media as a promotional tool. Moreover, there are also lecture rooms of some private campuses that do not have air conditioner, and also there are some private campuses whose tuition fees are not affordable in the community.

In addition, the results of respondents’ answers also found that accreditation is a determinant factor of prospective students to choose private universities in Medan.

The result of factor test was done with feasibility of model as follows (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Factor Test Result

1. This research estimated 11 constructs of latent variable formers, [5 x 11=55] while the sample of this study is 150 people, thus the sample size of this study has fulfilled the assumption.

2. The normality test used the Critical Ratio value (C.R.) skewness ± 2.58 at the 0.01 level of significance. Normality test results show that the value of C.R. the entire construct skewness is in the range of ± 2.58, which means that it meets the normality assumption (Table 6).

Table 6
Normality Test Result
Variable Skewness C.R. kurtosis C.R.
Students decision -.958 -4.791 -.103 -.256
x51 -.717 -3.586 .146 .365
x52 -.362 -1.808 -.558 -1.396
x41 -1.290 -2.452 1.367 1.417
x42 -1.063 -2.316 1.706 1.265
x31 -.668 -1.340 -.273 -.681
x32 -.817 -4.087 .001 .002
x21 -.989 -4.944 .522 1.304
x22 -.372 -1.862 -.477 -1.192
x11 -.720 -3.602 -.423 -1.057
x12 -1.180 -5.899 1.301 3.253

3. The goodness of fit test was carried out by comparing the value of the cut-off value index with the value of the goodness of fit test as follows (Table 7):

Table 7
Goodness Of Fit Test Result
Goodness of fit index Cut of value Result Remark
Chi-square Expected small 73.463 Good
Probability > 0.05 0.000 Marginal
CMIN/DF < 2.00 2.041 Marginal
RMSEA < 0.08 0.084 Marginal
CFI > 0.95 0.934 Marginal
GFI > 0.90 0.920 Good
AGFI > 0.90 0.853 Marginal
TLI > 0.95 0.899 Marginal

The results of goodness of fit testing indicate that the Cut of value for Chi-square and GFI is good value, while for testing the Probability, CMIN/DF, RMSEA, CFI, AGFI and TLI, the values are marginal value.

The testing process of the hypothesis of this study used regression weights test to see the magnitude of the effect of education fee, promotion, brand image, motivation and facilities for student decisions. The test criteria were done by looking at the C.R. generated in the table regression weights value C.R.>2.58 at a significant level of 0.01 or C.R value.>1.96 at 0.05 significance level.

The results of the first hypothesis testing Table 8 showed that the variable cost of education, promotion, brand image, motivation and facilities have value C.R.>2.58, with significance value (P)<0.01, or the value of C.R. each variable is higher than 1.96, with a significance value (P)<0.05, which means that the research hypothesis is proven. Thus, the costs of education, promotion, brand image, motivation and facilities have a positive and significant effect on student decisions.

Table 8
Results Of The First Hypothesis
Variable     Estimate S.E. C.R. P Label
Students decision image School tuition .467 .081 5.733 *** par_6
Students decision image Promotion .297 .090 3.309 *** par_7
Students decision image Brand image .238 .056 4.241 *** par_8
Students decision image Motivation .502 .142 3.546 *** par_9
Students decision image Facilities .443 .157 2.816 .005 par_10

The testing process of the second hypothesis Table 9 used the CFA model (Confirmatory Factory Analysis), which means to test the construct theoretically (manifest) whether the construct is valid and reliable form as a latent construct. The students’ latent decay construct consisted of 5 dimensions of forming, they are: education fee, promotion, brand image, motivation and facility.

Table 9
Second Hyotesis Test
Variable     Estimate S.E. C.R. P Label
x12 image School tuition 1.000        
x11 image School tuition 2.886 .682 4.235 *** par_1
x22 image Promotion 1.000        
x21 image Promotion 1.497 .328 4.562 *** par_2
x32 image Brand image 1.000        
x31 image Brand image .516 .098 5.283 *** par_3
x42 image Motivation 1.000        
x41 image Motivation 1.429 .190 7.532 *** par_4
x52 image Facilities 1.000        
x51 image Facilities 1.177 .245 4.809 *** par_5

The result of the second hypothesis test shows that the value of C.R.>2.58, and each constructing construct has value of sig<0.01, which means that all constructing constructs were able to explain its existence to latent variables. Some of the constructs of this research are in line with the results of research (Padlee et al., 2010), which stated that the determinants of choosing colleges are: learning quality, cost, facilities, socialization and location.

Research of (Lien et al., 2015) also stated that brand image, price, trust and value influence the purchase intentions. In addition, the research of (Fure et al., 2015) also stated that simultaneously brand image, product quality and price significantly influence consumer purchase, meanwhile partially brand image and product quality significantly influence. In contrary, price variable have insignificant effect. Research of (Dahari & Ya, 2011) also stated that the main factors that influencing parents' choice of preschools in private institutions are brand, safety, quality of teaching and hygiene, besides English-speaking and faith-based schools as additional consideration. The same matter with this study was also stated by (Zain et al., 2013) who stated that there is a substantial positive influence of perception and promotion on the choice of students in choosing private higher education.

Conclusion And Direction For Future Research

The results of this study indicated that the cost of education, promotion, brand image, motivation and facilities have positive and significant effect on the decision of students to choose private universities in Medan, Indonesia. The whole constructor of each variable is able to explain its existence to latent variables. In addition, from the results of the respondents’ answers it was found that there were other factors, why prospective students chose private universities in Medan: because of accreditation. Thus, this study provides some suggestions and recommendations for private universities in the city of Medan Indonesia, in the form of: (1) private campus should provide more brochures containing various information about education on campus respectively to the community, (2) private campus sector should facilitate each classroom with air conditioners; (3) every private campus should be able to compete with other private campuses in terms of management; (4) each private campus should intensely inform their campuses to the public through various media as promotional media; (5) tuition fees set by each private campus should consider the capabilities of the surrounding community to pay. This research only focuses on the variable costs of education, promotion, brand image, motivation and facilities. The focus of further research is suggested to be directly at the developing of other variables in the improvement of the model that had been built in this study.

Acknowledgement

We wish to express our sincere appreciation to the Directorate of Research and Community Service, Directorate General of Research and Development Affirmation, Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education, Republic of Indonesia, for giving full sponsorship to this research work.

References