Keywords

Entrepreneurship Orientation, External Factors, Value Creation, Marketing Performance.

Introduction

Small Medium Enterprise(SME) has been trusted as supporting of economic development in a country, both in advanced country and developing country (Sulaeman, 2004). Indonesian Bank (BI) records the economic in Indonesia, one of which is supported by Small Medium Enterprise that provides contribution until 99% for Indonesia economic development, which in 2012 reaches 6.2% and the rest is 1% in form of big business. According to the context of national industry development, the attention to grow Small Medium Enterprise is at least based on 3 reasons, which is Small Medium Enterprise absorbs many labours, Small Medium Enterprise intensives in using local natural resources and makes positive impact towards the equitable of income distribution and economic development in village (Kuncoro, 2010).

Small Medium Enterprise in Indonesia today is faced on readiness faces ASEAN Economic Society (MEA), in which most of goods trading of intra ASEAN gets benefit rate 0% (zero rate). This is a chance for Small Medium Enterprise to fulfil ASEAN market needs with product excellence possessed, especially the product that has competitiveness as creative and innovative industry (Wicaksono & Nuvriasari, 2012). Small Medium Enterprise has to keep and improve standard, design and product quality in order to be appropriate with customer’s provision in ASEAN (Abdurofiq, 2015). As for, SME-Industry based, which is covering business units that conduct production process which is known by the term of Small Medium Industry (SMI) is managed by Ministry of Industry. SMI is a business group with the number of labour is about 5 until 99 people and the selling turnover is between 200 million until 50 billion IDR that is owned by Indonesian (Protret Tiga Setengah Tahun Pelaksanaan Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Industri Manufaktur 2005-2009, 2008). One of the famous Small Medium Enterprise in Indonesia is Batik Tulis business in Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. In the 1980s, Batik is formal dress that must be worn in every state event or others formal events in Indonesia. Batik is one of cultural heritage belongs to Indonesia that has acquired the admission from UNESCO since 2^nd October 2009 (Nurainun & Rasyimah, 2008). The development of Batik Tulis Small Medium Enterprise is getting decreased; it is seen from the decreasing of Batik production business which switches to other business. Business of Batik in Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta in 1970 reached 1200 business units, while in 2014 there are 697 business units which is recorded in Department of Cooperative, Industry and Commerce (Nurainun & Rasyimah, 2008). The reduction in the number of Batik Small Medium Enterprise is not be separated from the low of marketing performance gained, for processing results of resources that is owned by Small Medium Enterprise, which is human and product. Truly, to improve company marketing performance is needed the support from human resources in entrepreneurship orientation (Cho & Jung, 2014).

Indonesia is a country that is famous with the term of multicultural. It can be seen from the diversity of arts and cultures which spreads widely in every area, included Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Batik Tulis is one of arts and cultures from Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, but arts and cultures will not develop if business of Batik Tulis has no entrepreneurship orientation, remembering it is one of the initial capital to reach a good company performance (Lumpkin & Dess, 1996). Small Medium Enterprise of Batik Tulis has opportunity ad chance where Batik is one of Indonesian’s arts and cultures, in fact of many Small Medium Enterprises of Batik Tulis cannot keep struggle the growing and the competitiveness finally. It is caused some obstacles, such as: the decreasing of young generation who is interested to sustain business of traditional Batik Tulis and they prefer Batik with using printing technology (Saraswati & Pamungkas, 2016). From those statements, it seems degradation of entrepreneurship orientation from businessmen of Batik Tulis. The decreasing of Batik craftsmen’s interest is contrary with the government’s effort to encourage Small Medium Enterprise (Tambunan, 2005). So that it needs attention to Small Medium Enterprise, especially entrepreneurship orientation from businessmen of Batik Tulis in Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta.

Entrepreneurship orientation reflects the priority that company identifies and takes the chance from external environment like factor of politic, economic, social culture, technology, environment, law and all of them play role in explaining individual decision to use the opportunity (Block, Fisch, Hahn & Sandner, 2015). Those cases can be guidance that one of factor which influences company performance in its marketing is entrepreneurship orientation that is triggered by surrounding environment factor in order to encourage entrepreneurship activity. External factors influence the tendency of businessmen to be involved in entrepreneurship activity (Suh & Kim, 2014). Government as economy regulator and one of company’s external factors form economic climate for company, helps providing infrastructure and learning for businessmen, make environment’s rule in which business operates and take the active role in promotion and marketing (Ghazali & Weetman, 2006). Some studies show that business is related to external factor involvement can improve company performance and give contribution for competitive advantage (Menguc, Auh & Ozanne, 2010; Shiamwama, Ombayo & Mukolwe, 2014; Wang, Zhou, Ning & Chen, 2015). Remember, there is relationship between environment factor with marketing performance (Gadenne, Mia, Sands, Winata & Hooi, 2012), so it needs to be reviewed the relationship of marketing performance with entrepreneurship orientation on Small Medium Enterprise of Batik Tulis in Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta.

Each of Batik Tulis which is created has value content, not only the value from price but also another invisible value which is searched by customer like traditional and prestige (Cass & Ngo, 2011). This is implying the importance of observing value creation on Batik Tulis in order to improve customer’s interest in having or conducting Batik Tulis’s purchasing of others Batik or ordinary clothes. By improving value from Batik Tulis product, so it will also improve customer’s buying interest. Reviewing of that, the meaning is marketing performance of Batik Tulis will improve if the creation of Batik Tulis by Small Medium Enterprise’s actors in Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta can be improved. Truly, there is correlation between value creation and marketing performance (Abdullah & Sukandi, 2011; Cass & Ngo, 2011). Value creation is process happened inside of company, resources that is bought as input to production process, to get the new use value. Entrepreneurship orientation has positive effect in company value creation, where the high entrepreneurship orientation will make decision to allocate the resources which can create value in business opportunity (Martins & Fernandes, 2015). So as with the correlation from external factors in product value creation (Prada & Andrade, 2014). Innovation as one of entrepreneurship orientation dimensions can bring company to get the benefit (Kafouros, Wang, Piperopoulos & Zhang, 2015). Small Medium Enterprise is known as source of innovative product and innovation system process and the strong of entrepreneurship orientation relationship with performance is depends on the characteristic of external environment (Wiklund & Shepherd, 2005).

Reviewing of research phenomenon seems the study focuses on marketing performance evaluation for entrepreneurship orientation and external factors through value creation, with the study on Small Medium Enterprise of Batik Tulis in Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. The review is related to the relationship of entrepreneurship orientation with marketing performance are conducted before (Wiklund & Shepherd, 2005), but the relation with external factors and value creation fully have never been reviewed, in particular of Small Medium Enterprise in Indonesia. So it seems the research position recently is completing the previous research, which is useful for Small Medium Enterprise generally, which the importance of developing entrepreneurship orientation.

Materials and Methods

The Relationship of Entrepreneurship Orientation, Environmental Factor and Value Creation

In development of entrepreneurship orientation, it is defined as strategic process that is conducted by company; entrepreneurship orientation reflects policy and practice that become basic for decision and entrepreneurship action (Rauch, Wiklund, Lumpkin & Frese, 2009). Therefore, entrepreneurship orientation can be regarded as the process of entrepreneurship strategy creation that is used by decision maker in reaching the company’s goal, maintaining their business and creating competitive advantage. Generally, entrepreneurship orientation is a company strategic orientation that can comprehend aspect of decision making of entrepreneurship which is specific, style, method and practice (Frank, Kessler & Fink, 2010). Besides that, it is said that entrepreneurship orientation reflects style and special methods about strategic guidance, decision making and running a business (Lan & Wu, 2009).

Surely, entrepreneurship orientation can be valued from some dimensions, in study of Hughes & Morgan (2007), identified five dimensions of entrepreneurship orientation that have a big influence on performance as the important priority for small business which has limited resources that is growing, such as: innovation, be brave in taking risk, proactive, aggressively compete and autonomy. The same cases also stated by Naldi, Nordqvist, Sjoberg & Wiklund (2007) & Rauch et al. (2009), who judge that entrepreneurship orientation is better seen as multidimensional construction which is innovation, proactive, taking risk, aggressively compete and autonomy because it impacts to performance; it is different in organization context on Small Medium Enterprises needed entrepreneurship orientation, in order to improve value creation on product created. This case based on reviewing from the previous studies which seems there is relationship between entrepreneurship orientation with value creation (Keil, Maula & Syrigos, 2015; Martins & Fernandes, 2015). Innovation as one of entrepreneurship orientation dimensions is potential to create value, introduce product or new service as source of traditional value creation (Hafeez, Noor, Shariff, Bin & Lazim, 2012).

Small Medium Enterprise is started from businessmen who can identify new chance in a society and encourage to use that opportunity (Yahya, Nair & Piaralal, 2014). In strategy maintaining value creation, supported by capability conducted in different activity or micro practice in Small Medium Enterprise (Achtenhagen, Melin & Naldi, 2013). Actually, company in maintaining value creation in a way of strategic action, capability and activity. Those three things as a tool for manager to help business model management. Perspective of dynamic capability can make company success in maintaining the value which needs selection of business idea and the number of resources and the competence which is hard to be imitated.

Entrepreneurship orientation that has owned by company influence positively in company value creation, in which the influence of decision directly hit to entrepreneurship’s behaviour and overflow authority are characteristic of entrepreneurship in organization, so that it encourages entrepreneurship’s behaviour (Keil et al., 2015). Value creation is one of bridge that can improve the value of a company; obviously, by improving the value of a business will give the value for the owner. Therefore, business owner will be care of the process and value creation result from a business. Value creation is the output of a process that encourages creativity and diversity, yet does not allow the players to go out of tune completely (Pagani, 2013).

Another aspects that must be considered in supporting entrepreneurship orientation to create company value is social culture in which businessmen has to make sure that every plan in entrepreneurship activity has conformity with local culture (Choi & Gray, 2008). Actually, culture and tradition from the environment of businessmen have the impact on product value creation or service created by company (Prada & Andrade, 2014). Environment factors is a pool of resources; the degree of resources abundance is called environmental munificence and it will significantly influence the start-up process (Gomezelj & Kusce, 2013). Meanwhile, Mann & Blum (2002) define environment factors as “The role of company with an emphasis on initiative, innovation and entrepreneurship, within organization or independently”. These factors as determining factors to produce and entrepreneurship can be used as basic determining of an organization face with uncertainty of environment. The input, especially on regulation or rule that is enacted by government, where businessmen has to participate and balancing or investigating all of regulations initiated (Li, Zhao, Shi & Li, 2014). Those statements are stated by the previous studies, where it is explained that macroeconomic factor has the meaning of existing the relationship between external factors (macroeconomic and cultural factors) with value creation (Hegbrant & Hellberg, 2014).

Culture is the strongest component that influences businessmen to create value which is the value of economic, social and environment that become target of value creation (Hechavarria et al., 2016). At Small Medium Enterprise in Indonesia, external factors are needed to encourage in creating the product value. From the review of entrepreneurship orientation, external factors and value creation for Small Medium Enterprise, so it is stated the hypothesis of this study which is mixed on Hypothesis 1 (H1) and Hypothesis 2 (H2).

H1: Implementation of entrepreneurship orientation can influence value creation of Small Medium Enterprise on its product.

H2: Orientation of company external factors can influence value creation of Small Medium Enterprise on its product.

The Relationship of Value Creation and Marketing Performance

Value creation is one of bridges that can improve the value of a business, of course by improving the value of a business will give the value for the owner (Poulain-Rehm & Lepers, 2013). Besides that, value creation is also useful in measuring performance of company (Cass & Ngo, 2011), in which it seems the value obtained from the product assessed by its customer as the dimension success of value creation (Awa, 2010). Small Medium Enterprise as businessman in Indonesia faced by value creation of its product, in this case the value of carving on Batik Tulis. Remember, the transcription on Batik that created can influence customer’s assessment, where product value of Batik is its motif (Sanabila & Manurung, 2009). The final result of the perfect value creation is supporting on a good marketing performance, those cases are in line with the review of some previous researches (Abdullah & Sukandi, 2011; Cass & Ngo, 2011; Chen, Wang, Huang & Shen, 2016).

To get benefit from the value created, it is conducted through innovation activity (Biggemann, Williams & Kro, 2014). It explains the importance of innovation on product value creation of company. Innovation which is done by Small Medium Enterprise of Batik Tulis obviously needs to be noticed, in order to improve the value of Batik that it is created. Kotler & Keller (2012) said that “Value creation is how a company can efficiently create more promising new value offering? To exploit a value opportunity, the company needs value-creation skills.” Those opinions affirm that value creation is closely related with the change of more efficiently product value and company needs that ability. In which company can be more focus on its customer. Small Medium Enterprise is known as innovative product source and in the process of innovative system, it has competitive advantage like response from market, effective internal communication in an innovation activity (Najib & Kiminami, 2011).

Company as economic actor and legal entity; in its role as customer and provider. As customer, company tries to optimize customer’s advantages and as provider, company aims to optimize the income obtained from customer from product and service provided (Bowman & Ambrosini, 2000). Product and service provided is surely focus to review about value creation process, with recommendation from creation value to create organization performance (Cass & Ngo, 2011). Organization performance can be separated from marketing performance (Imam & Zainul, 2014), where something that is produced by company in certain period with refers to the standards assigned (Clark, 2001). Those reviews emphasize indirectly that marketing performance is the result from company performance. It is emphasized by Chenhall & Langfield-Smith (2007), who stated “Firm performance in its broadest sense as the outcomes of organizational activities can be characterized in financial and non-financial parameters”. Why company performance is not marketing performance. The essence of those opinions are the same with the first opinion from (Clark, 2001), which is the pressing of the result obtained by company. The final result of value creation is on marketing performance, based on those reviews so it is made the hypothesis three (H3).

H3: Value creation on Small Medium Enterprise can influence the improvement of marketing performance.

From three hypotheses proposed (H1, H2 and H3), so it seems the research framework explained on Figure 1.

Research Method

This empirical study reviewed the impact of entrepreneurship orientation implementation and external factors in value creation, also its impact on marketing performance. Descriptive and verification study were conducted by research hypothesis testing (H1, H2 and H3). Data and information obtained by questionnaire and direct survey to Small Medium Enterprise of Batik Tulis in Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta Indonesia. In which it was determined about 125 respondents which was the owner from Small Medium Enterprise of Batik Tulis, with the data retrieval as cross sectional one shot in 2016. There were four research variables, such as: entrepreneurship orientation, external factors, value creation and marketing performance. The research construct was measured by dimension and indicator stated in research questionnaire. In measuring the research construct used five points of Likert Scale 1-5 which was “disagree” until “agree”.

The measurement of each research variables explained as follows:

Entrepreneurship Orientation (ENTRE) consisted of four dimension such as: innovation (product design, product idea, creativity, number of product, product introduction), proactive (opportunity to develop business, fulfil market demands, market information, response competitor, initiative), risk taking (capital access, bearing of risk, big assets, experiment) and autonomy (labour acts and thinks individually, authority and labour’s responsibility, labour’s freedom, information for labour and labour’s initiative). External Factors (EXTE) included three dimensions like social culture (the influence of culture, local resources, entrepreneurship tradition), Public Support (promotion supporting, product protection, training of product standardization, training of entrepreneurship) and technology (electricity equipment, internet, information through internet). Value Creation (VALC) consisted four dimensions, such as: performance value (product quality, product over customer’s expectation, innovative product features), Value Price (a fair price, a consistence price, benefit price for customer), value of co creation (customer interaction, design product with customer, cooperation with customer), Relationship Value (easiness of access, special offering, the relationship of long period). Marketing Performance (MART) consisted of two dimensions like selling volume (selling growth and selling volume), Market Segment (the improvement of market segment and the improvement of market segment growth). Furthermore, the complete research model would be tested and stated on Figure 2.

Remember the research model (Figure 2) lead to path analysis, so it is used SmartPLS as data processing. And for conformance test of the research model, it was conducted validity test (Loading Factors, Average Variance Extracted) and reliability test (Cronbach’s Alpha, Composite Reliability) for research questionnaire.

Results

The study result is derived data about 125 questionnaires from Small Medium Enterprise of Batik Tulis’s owner in Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. In which the average Small Medium Enterprise of Batik Tulis has been over 10 years in making Batik Tulis, with the numbers of workers are over 5 people. From the respondents’ background seem that Business of Batik Tulis that is initiated are a form of preservation of local culture; besides that it can produce profit for them because Small Medium Enterprise of Batik Tulis is hereditary business.

From the data obtained by questionnaire, it is conducted validity test and data reliability, with the provision for the value of Loading Factors and Average Variance Extracted (AVE)>0.5, while the value of Cronbach’s Alpha and Composite Reliability>0.7. Based on Table 1 and Table 2, it seems all of the values fulfil the determined standard. So it can be assumed the research model fulfils the requirement of model conformity. As for the research model of test result stated on Figure 3.

Table 1 Test Results of 1
ITEMS	EXTE	ENTRE	MART	VALC
X11		0.887
X12		0.839
X13		0.795
X14		0.718
X21	0.743
X22	0.808
X23	0.683
Y1				0.722
Y2				0.684
Y3				0.828
Y4				0.856
Z1			0.936
Z2			0.963

Table 2 Test Result of 2
Variables	Composite Reliability	Average Variance Extracted (AVE)	Cronbach's Alpha
EXTE	0.790	0.557	0.702
ENTRE	0.885	0.660	0.828
MART	0.948	0.902	0.893
VALC	0.803	0.522	0.674

The test result which is conducted (Tables 1 and 2 and Figure 3) next to test the study result is conducted Hypothesis test. Hypothesis stated there are three (H1, H2 and H3), from all of hypotheses proposed is support for the result. In which the meaning of them are appropriate with the expectation, which is there is influence from entrepreneurship orientation on value creation (H1), the influence of external factors on value creation (H2) and the influence of value creation on marketing performance (H3). Those test value seem on Table 3.

Table 3 Coefficient Path
	Original Sample (O)	Sample Mean (M)	Standard Deviation (STDEV)	T Statistics (|O/STDEV|)
ENTRE->VALC	0.446	0.450	0.080	5.551
EXTE->VALC	0.374	0.383	0.072	5.185
VALC->MART	0.447	0.449	0.074	6.062

Value Creation of Small Medium Enterprise Product of Batik Tulis through Businessmen Entrepreneurship Orientation and the Control of External Factor Industry

The research finding explained there is relationship between entrepreneurship orientations with value creation (Figure 3). This case explains directly that to improve product value from Batik Tulis in Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta is needed entrepreneurship orientation from businessmen of Small Medium Enterprise. It is in line with the previous study of Keil et al. (2015), who explained the correlation between entrepreneurship orientation with value creation process. Entrepreneurship orientation is making decision process of company through innovation and new creativity, in delivering company success.

So that innovation, proactive, risk taking and autonomy from businessmen can improve value creation Small Medium Enterprise of Batik Tulis. In entrepreneurship orientation, innovation becomes the major dimension that needs to be noticed. Innovation seems to be a trigger for businessmen to give the best product (Szczepa?ska-Woszczyna, 2015). The same case also seems happened on Small Medium Enterprise of Batik Tulis in Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Next, the measurement of proactive from businessmen also become the important measurement, remember spirit and passion to go forward accompany usually proactive from businessmen (Hussain, Talib & Shah, 2014), in providing the best product creation. One of the current innovations on Batik Tulis is the use of “green batik” concept which uses the natural dyes, which leads environment issue for the product. That concept has truly impact on customer’s interest, because customer’s friction today has already on friendly products (Alamsyah & Angliawati, 2015).Innovation in Batik motif that combines traditional batik concept and design with combining transcription and printing motif as superior product where a high quality and valuable product are under the competitor; that case is the value created by SME of Batik Tulis. The rest that must be noticed is on entrepreneurship orientation is risk taking soul where businessmen of Batik Tulis do experiment before they produce batik, in order to get a high quality of Batik Tulis and autonomy for their business, in which they give authority to workers who make batik to be creative in creating a valuable Batik. Besides of entrepreneurship orientation, external factor has control for value creation UMKM of Batik Tulis. It seems on Figure 3, explained its correlation value on value creation. This finding is line with previous study from Hegbrant & Hellberg (2014); those findings explain that value creation can be improved if Batik Tulis’s businessmen in Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta can observe external factor.

Some of considerations in external factor are social culture, public support and technology. Public support becomes the most closely measurement and external factor, like at company in getting investor commonly investor notices the assessment of public support (Plotnicki & Szyszka, 2014). It means the overview of public support needs to be attention for Small Medium Enterprise of Batik Tulis, especially public support also became support to evaluate company performance indirectly (Goedhuys & Sleuwaegen, 2013). The other cases that must be noticed in external factor are social culture and technology. Batik Tulis is not separated from social and culture element, in fact of Batik is original traditional culture from Indonesia (Sanabila & Manurung, 2009). So this element becomes one of dimension in external factor, it is the same with technology. In which the development of technology actually attracts the attention both big or small businessmen that exist on Small Medium Enterprise (Chumaidiyah, 2012). The influence of environment factor encourages value creation on Small Medium Enterprise with fixing service from government, like training program of Batik Tulis’s businessmen which can help them. Helping like learning Batik making process that is efficient appropriate with standardization, such as training of RISPRO (Research of Batik Tulis Natural Dyes), concerning about high quality-colouring that is held by Balai Batik who corporates with Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta University. And also exhibition and protection of Batik Tulis from modern batik where batik will give certification in form of mark-batik that aims to protect the original Batik Tulis product. Value creation by government is more than innovation, both organization or policy and more than leadership. Government as instrument from the whole of choices and activities with constitution, institution, policy, program, rule and others are social construction (Kirlin, 1996).

Compared with entrepreneurship orientation, the impact of external factor is actually bigger. It seems from coefficient value (Figure 3), reviewing that result is recommended for Small Medium Enterprise of Batik Tulis keep focus review and keep maintain external factor, but it is not forget entrepreneurship orientation. Because if both factors are combined, it is surely has a quite good impact on this creation, which is 45%. Innovation from this study is the existing of literature simultaneously among entrepreneurship orientation and external factor on value creation. In which a part of those study has not already been literature of the previous researches.

Improving Marketing Performance through Value Creation

Company exists to create the value for other people which is customer (Biggemann et al., 2014). However, there is a few research has developed comprehensive environment which impacts on all of organization system and give additional value for organization and company stakeholders (Sutthirak, 2012). Company as economic actor and legal entity, in the role as customer and provider, as company customer tries to optimize customer surplus. Company aims to optimize profit obtained from customer from product and service provided (Bowman & Ambrosini, 2000). Small Medium Enterprise of Batik Tulis in Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta does the same, in this case gives the best product for customer through adding value on its Batik. It seems from the measurement explained on value creation which is performance value for product, price value stated, cooperation value with customer in creating product and the relationship value built. Small Medium Enterprise of Batik Tulis feels that value creation will do well when it can conduct cooperation with customer in case of product creation; in the meaning of Batik Tulis manufacture depends on customer’s desire. This is not rarely happened, remember company often tries to touch its customer with co-creation value (Biggemann et al., 2014). Cooperation between company and customer in product creation surely bring to positive way, where comfortable feeling and customer’s satisfaction will also improve (Yin & Jamali, 2016). This case maintained by Small Medium Enterprise of Batik Tulis, in the effort of maintaining its marketing performance.

Besides that the relationship value formed by Small Medium Enterprise also support of value creation. Customer is very appreciating for special offering from product offered by Small Medium Enterprise. Customer is not often think that Batik Tulis is premium product (Sanabila & Manurung, 2009), so special offering is big opportunity which needs to be responded by customer. And long step which is conducted by Small Medium Enterprise of Batik Tulis is try to remember customer with the product design that is appropriate with customer’s desire (Sirdeshmukh, Singh & Sabol, 2002). In value creation, the value of product performance, such as: product quality, product that is over customer’s satisfaction, innovative product features, also price value for product like a fair price, a consistence price, a profitable price for customer; it is actually can create the better of value creation. Those cases obviously need to be maintained by Small Medium Enterprise, in the relation with marketing performance of it. Value creation given by Small Medium Enterprise of Batik Tulis finally can control marketing performance, this case is depends on correlation value that seems on Figure 3.

Reviewing from the finding of this chapter, it seems to explain the similarity with the previous research (Abdullah & Sukandi, 2011; Cass & Ngo, 2011; Chen et al., 2016; Husted & Allen, 2007), where it explains that marketing performance from company can be improved if company can give the best value both product and its service. However, if it is combined with the previous result, it seems to appear new research model (invention), which is the improvement of marketing performance through value creation also support from entrepreneurship orientation and external factors (Figure 3). Remember the finding of this research model especially Small Medium Enterprise of Batik Tulis has never been the review of the previous study. Also the impact of this finding is also useful for Small Medium Enterprise in Indonesia generally, where businessmen gathers on Small Medium Enterprise that suggested considering entrepreneurship orientation and the influence of external factors before create the value for product and its service. After that, it will reach a better marketing performance. By improving marketing performance from Small Medium Enterprise in a country, it obviously encourages economic improvement from that country, like Indonesia; so the support from government is very expected. At least, this study result can be the useful information for government in considering the improvement of Small Medium Enterprise through performance-entrepreneurship and value creation based.

Discussion

Marketing performance from Small Medium Enterprise of Batik Tulis becomes a barometer of company success. So SME of Batik Tulis tries to improve marketing performance through value creation and also entrepreneurship orientation and external factors control. Actually, after it has conducted the examination of entrepreneurship orientation and external factors are indeed capable to influence businessmen of Batik Tulis in implementation of product value creation and its service. Businessmen need to observe innovation-soul and proactive, this case becomes dimension of success from entrepreneurship orientation besides risk taking-soul and autonomy. Besides that, some cases which need to be considered from external factors are public support, except social culture and technology. Those research sections complete the previous research (Hegbrant & Hellberg, 2014; Keil et al., 2015), but there is difference of dimension and review model, where it is conducted simultaneously in the study today.

Other conclusion that stated is SME of Batik Tulis finally find value creation of product and its service. It is determined by dimension of co-creation and the relationship value, also the value of product performance and the value price determined. Besides that, actually value creation that is conducted by SME of Batik Tulis can improve marketing performance. Those cases seem from the development of market segment and selling volume, which have good correlation with marketing performance. So value creation can be as one of barometer to reach marketing performance. Research model reviewed in this study is the latest findings, although it completes from other researches separately. And the study result can be used by SME generally in Indonesia in the effort of fixing marketing performance through value creation and support from entrepreneurship orientation also external factor. Today, it has spread the marketing effort with the review of environment through green marketing concept (Ko, Hwang & Kim, 2013), those cases are suggested to be reviewed furthermore. Remember it has not already explained on the study currently and it has impact on marketing performance (Ariffin, Yusof, Putit & Shah, 2016).

References

1. Abdullah, Y. & Sukandi, P. (2011). The influence of market strategy and value creation on marketing performance. In: International Seminar on Business and Management (pp. 1051-11). De La Salle Lipa.
2. Abdurofiq, A. (2015). Menakar pengaruh masyarakat ekonomi asean 2015 terhadap pembangunan Indonesia. Jurnal Filsafat Dan Budaya Hukum, 1(2), 249-256.
3. Achtenhagen, L., Melin, L. & Naldi, L. (2013). Dynamics of business models-strategizing, critical capabilities and activities for sustained value creation. Long Range Planning, 46(6), 427-442.
4. Alamsyah, D.P. & Angliawati, R.Y. (2015). Buying behavior of organic vegetables product: The effects of perceptions of quality and risk. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 4(12), 28-35.
5. Ariffin, S., Yusof, J.M., Putit, L. & Shah, M.I.A. (2016). Factors influencing perceived quality and repurchase intention towards green products. Procedia Economics and Finance, 37(16), 391-396.
6. Awa, H.O. (2010). Democratizing the new product development process: A new dimension of value creation and marketing concept. International Business Research, 3(2), 49-60.
7. Biggemann, S., Williams, M. & Kro, G. (2014). Building in sustainability, social responsibility and value co-creation. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 29(4), 304-312.
8. Block, J.H., Fisch, C.O., Hahn, A. & Sandner, P.G. (2015). Why do smes file trademarks? Insights from firms in innovative industries. Research Policy, 44(10), 1915-1930.
9. Bowman, C. & Ambrosini, V. (2000). Value creation versus value capture: Towards a coherent definition of value in strategy. British Journal of Management, 11, 1-15.
10. Cass, A.O. & Ngo, L.V. (2011). Examining the firm’s value creation process: A managerial perspective of the firm’s value offering strategy and performance. British Journal of Management, 22, 646-671.
11. Chen, K.H., Wang, C.H., Huang, S.Z. & Shen, G.C. (2016). Service innovation and new product performance: The influence of market-linking capabilities and market turbulence. International Journal of Production Economics, 172, 54-64.
12. Chenhall, R.H. & Langfield-Smith, K. (2007). Multiple perspectives of performance measures. European Management Journal, 25(4), 266-282.
13. Cho, Y.S. & Jung, J.Y. (2014). The relationship between metacognion, entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: An empirical investigation. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 20(2), 71-86.
14. Choi, D.Y. & Gray, E.R. (2008). Socially responsible entrepreneurs: What do they do to create and build their companies? Business Horizons, 51(4), 341-352.
15. Chumaidiyah, E. (2012). The technology, technical skill and R&D capability in increasing profitability on Indonesia telecommunication services companies. In: International Conference on Small and Medium Enterprises Development with a Theme Innovation and Sustainability in SME Development (pp. 110-119).
16. Clark, B.H. (2001). A summary of thinking on measuring the value of marketing. Journal of Targeting, Measurment and Analysis for Marketing, 9(4), 357-369.
17. Frank, H., Kessler, A. & Fink, M. (2010). Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance-A replication study. Schmalenbach Business Review, 62(April), 175-198.
18. Gadenne, D., Mia, L., Sands, J., Winata, L. & Hooi, G. (2012). The influence of sustainability performance management practices on organisational sustainability performance. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 8(2), 210-235.
19. Ghazali, N.A.M. & Weetman, P. (2006). Perpetuating traditional influences: Voluntary disclosure in Malaysia following the economic crisis. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 15(2), 226-248.
20. Goedhuys, M. & Sleuwaegen, L. (2013). The impact of international standards certification on the performance of firms in less developed countries. World Development, 47, 87-101.
21. Gomezelj, D.O. & Kusce, I. (2013). The influence of personal and environmental factors on entrepreneurs’ performance. Kybernetes, 42(6), 906-927.
22. Hafeez, M.H., Noor, M., Shariff, M., Bin, H. & Lazim, M. (2012). Relationship between entrepreneurial orientation, firm resources, sme branding and firm’s performance: Is innovation the missing link? American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 2, 153-159.
23. Hechavarría, D.M., Terjesen, S.A., Ingram, A.E., Renko, M., Justo, R. & Elam, A. (2016). Taking care of business: The impact of culture and gender on entrepreneurs’ blended value creation goals. Small Business Economics, 1-33.
24. Hegbrant, J. & Hellberg, F. (2014). Macroeconomic factors influencing cross-border merger & Acquisitions value. Lund University.
25. Hughes, M. & Morgan, R.E. (2007). Deconstructing the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and business performance at the embryonic stage of firm growth. Industrial Marketing Management, 36, 651-661.
26. Hussain, H.K., Talib, N.A. & Shah, I.M. (2014). Exploring the impact of transformational leadership on process innovation and product innovation?: A case of iraqi public universities. Asian Social Science, 10(21), 168-175.
27. Husted, B.W. & Allen, D.B. (2007). Strategic corporate social responsibility and value creation among large firms: Lessons from the spanish experience. Long Range Planning, 40(6), 594-610.
28. Imam, S. & Zainul, A. (2014). The effect of market orientation and entrepreneurial orientation toward learning orientation, innovation. Competitive Advantages and Marketing Performance, 6(21), 69-81.
29. Kafouros, M., Wang, C., Piperopoulos, P. & Zhang, M. (2015). Academic collaborations and firm innovation performance in china: The role of region-specific institutions. Research Policy, 44(3), 803-817.
30. Keil, T., Maula, M. & Syrigos, E. (2015). CEO entrepreneurial orientation, entrenchment and firm value creation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 1-30.
31. Kirlin, J.J. (1996). What government must do well: Creating value for society. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6(1), 161-185.
32. Ko, E., Hwang, Y.K. & Kim, E.Y. (2013). Green marketing’ functions in building corporate image in the retail setting. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 1709-1715.
33. Kotler, P. & Keller, K.L. (2012). Marketing management. Prentice Hall.
34. Kuncoro, M. (2010). Ekonomika pembangunan (Masalah, kebijakan, dan Politik). Jakarta: Erlangga.
35. Lan, Q. & Wu, S. (2009). An empirical study of entrepreneurial orientation and degree of internationalization of small and medium-sized chinese manufacturing enterprises. Chinese Manufacturing Enterprises, 2(1), 1756-1396.
36. Li, Y., Zhao, X., Shi, D. & Li, X. (2014). Governance of sustainable supply chains in the fast fashion industry. European Management Journal, 32(5), 823-836.
37. Lumpkin, G.T. & Dess, G.G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. The Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135-172.
38. Mann, I.I. & Blum, I. (2002). Entrepreneurship and recent dietetic graduates. Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research, 63(2), 108-109.
39. Martins, J.M. & Fernandes, M.T. (2015). Too small to innovate? Creating value with fewer resources. Journal of Business Strategy, 36(2), 25-33.
40. Menguc, B., Auh, S. & Ozanne, L. (2010). The interactive effect of internal and external factors on a proactive environmental strategy and its influence on a firm’s performance. Journal of Business Ethics, (94), 279-298.
41. Najib, M. & Kiminami, A. (2011). Innovation, cooperation and business performance some evidence from indonesian small food processing cluster. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies, 1(1), 75-96.
42. Naldi, L., Nordqvist, M., Sjoberg, K. & Wiklund, J. (2007). Entrepreneurial orientation, risk taking and performance in family firms. Family Business Review, 20(1), 33-47.
43. Nurainun, O. & Rasyimah, H. (2008). Analisis industri batik di Indonesia. Jurnal Fokus Ekonomi, 7(3), 124-135.
44. Pagani, M. (2013). Digital business strategy and value creation: Framing the dynamic cycle of control points. Mis Quarterly, 37(2), 617-632.
45. Plotnicki, M. & Szyszka, A. (2014). IPO market timing: The evidence of the disposition effect among corporate managers. Global Finance Journal, 25(1), 48-55.
46. Poulain-Rehm, T. & Lepers, X. (2013). Does employee ownership benefit value creation? The case of france (2001-2005). Journal Business Ethics, 112, 325-340.
47. Prada, D.F. & Andrade, D.M. (2014). How do External Factors Influence SME’s Customer Value Creation in a New Foreign Market? A Case Study of Axelent A.B. Halmstad University. Halmstad University.
48. Protret Tiga Setengah Tahun Pelaksanaan Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Industri Manufaktur 2005-2009.
49. Rauch, A., Wiklund, J., Lumpkin, G.T. & Frese, M. (2009). Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance: An assessment of past research and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 761-787.
50. Sanabila, H.R. & Manurung, R. (2009). Recognition of batik motifs using the generalized hough transform. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Computer Science and Information Systems (pp. 1-6).
51. Saraswati, N. & Pamungkas, Y.H. (2016). Paguyuban batik sekar nitik kembangsongo, desa trimulyo, bantul tahun 2000-2015: Tinjauan sejarah dan perkembangannya. E-Journal Pendidikan Sejarah, 4(3), 593-608.
52. Shiamwama, S.M., Ombayo, J.A. & Mukolwe, M.S. (2014). Internal factors affecting the performance of businesses of retirees in kakamega municipality. International Journal of Business, Humanities and Technology, 4(2), 144-157.
53. Sirdeshmukh, D., Singh, J. & Sabol, B. (2002). Consumer trust, value and loyalty in relational exchanges. Journal of Marketing, 66(1), 15-37.
54. Suh, Y. & Kim, M.S. (2014). Internationally leading SME’s vs. Internationalized SMES: Evidence of success factors from south korea. International Business Review, 23(1), 115-129.
55. Sulaeman, S. (2004). Pengembangan usaha kecil dan menengah dalam menghadapi pasar regional dan global. Infokop, 25(20), 113-120.
56. Sutthirak, S. (2012). Value creation through stakeholders-A tool for reducing poverty in developing economies. 3(15), 165-177.
57. Szczepa?ska-Woszczyna, K. (2015). Leadership and organizational culture as the normative influence of top management on employee’s behaviour in the innovation process. Procedia Economics and Finance, 34(15), 396-402.
58. Tambunan, T. (2005). Promoting small and medium enterprises with a clustering approach: A policy experience from indonesia. Journal of Small Business Management, 43(2), 138-154.
59. Wang, Y., Zhou, Z., Ning, L. & Chen, J. (2015). Technology and external conditions at play: A study of learning-by-licensing practices in china. Technovation, 43(44), 29-39.
60. Wicaksono, G. & Nuvriasari, A. (2012). Meningkatkan kinerja umkm industri kreatif melalui pengembangan kewirausahaan dan orientasi pasar: Kajian pada peran serta wirausaha wanita di kecamatan moyudan, kabupaten sleman, propinsi diy. Jurnal Sosio Humaniora, 3(4), 27-39.
61. Wiklund, J. & Shepherd, D. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: A configurational approach. Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 71-91.
62. Yahya, N., Nair, S.R. & Piaralal, S.K. (2014). Green practices adoption framework for small and medium sized logistics firms in malaysia. Sains Humanika, 23, 79-84.
63. Yin, J. & Jamali, D. (2016). Strategic corporate social responsibility of multinational companies subsidiaries in emerging markets: Evidence from china. Long Range Planning.