Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues (Print ISSN: 1544-0036; Online ISSN: 1544-0044)

Review Article: 2022 Vol: 25 Issue: 2S

The impact of the corona pandemic on employment contracts in omani law

Ahmed Mohamed Ahmed El Zein, Dhofar University

Citation Information: El Zein, A. (2022). The impact of the corona pandemic on employment contracts in omani law. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 25(S2), 1-9.

Abstract

This study aims to know the impact of the Corona pandemic on employment contracts. There are many workers in different countries of the world who have lost their jobs due to the impact of this pandemic. The problem of the study is that there are many disputes that have arisen as a result of this pandemic, some of them are related to the termination of the work contract, some are related to the reduction of wages, some are related to the reduction of employment, and some are related to the non-performance of the agreed work. It is one of the precautionary policies imposed by countries to limit or try to mitigate this pandemic, or as a result of the worker being infected with Corona disease or placing him in quarantine.

Keywords

Corona Pandemic, Employment, Omani Law

Introduction

The Corona pandemic is an emergency phenomenon, and therefore there are many questions about the legal status of this phenomenon within the framework of labor law, which is to know: To what extent are the rules contained in the civil law applied within the framework of the theory of emergency conditions to the disputes that arise under these circumstances? Or are the rules of the rules contained in the Labor Law considered sufficient to deal with these disputes that arise due to this pandemic? What are the other sources that the competent judge can resort to in the absence of the text? Therefore, this study was likely to contribute to reaching some results that put solutions to some legal dilemmas in this field.

This pandemic first appeared in the Chinese city of Wuhan in December of the year 2019, and this disease spread widely. On the thirtieth of January of the year two thousand and twenty-first, the World Health Organization declared that the disease constitutes a state of health emergency in general, and on the eleventh of the same year it declared that this disease had turned into a pandemic, more than 148 million were infected in more than 188 countries in which it was about 3,100,000 deaths. About 86.3 million infected people have recovered from this disease until the 28th of April 2021 1.

Because this disease is contagious and it spreads in many ways and very quickly, many countries have taken many measures to limit the spread of this disease, including closing borders, curfews, and closing shops.

The impact of this pandemic was not limited to the disease it causes, which leads to the death of many people, but also extended to work relationships. This pandemic has affected many employees, and the privileged among them were those whose salaries were reduced and others were laid off. Some companies have given their employees unpaid vacation (Al-Zein, 2020).

This research aims to know the legal adaptation of the impact of this pandemic on employment contracts, and to know the implications of the actions taken by employers against workers from the termination and amendment of contracts.

The importance of the research is that the topic in general has become preoccupied with media public opinion, and intense controversy erupted around it because it deals with a large segment, which represents the vast majority. The topic raises theoretical importance represented in the legislation governing these emergency situations and the practical importance of many cases that arose regarding the establishment of some employers take some measures that affected workers (Faraj et al., 2002).

In order for the topic to be fulfilled its right, it was divided into two sections, the first section deals with the amendment of the work contract, and the second topic deals with the termination of the work contract. It was concluded with a number of results and recommendations, which we hope will help in this aspect.

The First Topic

Modifying Employment Contract

First of all, it is necessary to define an employment contract, which is defined as: “A set of legal rules that govern the relationship of private remunerated employment 2”. It was also defined as: “Every contract under which a natural person undertakes to work for an employer, under his management and supervision, in return for a wage 3.

It is also important to define the parties to the contract, and the beginning is with the definition of the employer, which is defined as: “Every natural or legal person who employs one or more workers in return for a wage 4.” As for the other party, which is the worker, it was defined as: “The worker: every natural person who works In return for a wage with an employer and under his management and supervision. 5 (Al-Ma’ashani, (n.d.)):

Due to the lack of production or economic conditions, the employer may reduce the wage by a certain percentage to meet the losses that resulted from the effects of this pandemic. The employer may also reduce the daily working hours or working days for the worker based on the decisions issued by the Supreme Committee to Combat Corona. But if the reduction of working hours or the reduction of the number of working days does not result in harm to the worker, there is no problem, but the problem arises when the employer reduces worker wages.

The employer may not deviate from the provisions of the contract or assign the worker to do work that is not agreed upon in the contract unless it is necessary and on a temporary basis. However, it is permissible for the worker to assign a work that is not agreed upon if that work is not fundamentally different from the original work 6, and there is no doubt that the wage is one of the essential elements of the employment contract. Any kind of amendment in the employment contract is considered a fundamental amendment that the employer is not entitled to make, but in the event the facility goes through a financial crisis, the employer will have only one of two options: to reduce the workers’ wages or terminate their contracts in order to be able to overcome this economic crisis 7.

Contracts in general - including the employment contract - are subject to what is known as the law of contract theory. The contract is the law of contracting parties and it may not be rescinded or amended except with the agreement of the two parties and for reasons approved by law 8.

The law has decided that if the contract is valid, no one of the contracting parties has the right to unilaterally amend it without the consent of the other party or without a judicial decision 9; because the contract takes the place of the law in regulating the relationship between its parties 10.

There is no doubt that the contract is the result of the will of its parties, and therefore the contract may not be set aside or amended by the judge on the grounds that the amendment is required by justice. Neither party has the right to exploit it by modifying it without the consent of the other party. This is the general rule; however, the contract can be modified by its parties 11.

This general rule is subject to some exceptions with which contracts may be amended, including employment contract. Among these rules is the theory of emergency circumstances; because the Corona pandemic is crossing an emergency circumstance that could not have been expected (al-Sanhoury, (n.d.)).

First - The Theory of Emergency Conditions

Under these circumstances, the employer must take all measures to preserve the safety of the work, including preparing thermostats, sterilizers, face masks, and other health measures to preserve the safety and health of workers 12.

The theory of emergency circumstances was decided by Article 159 of the Omani Civil Transactions Law of 2013, which states: “If general exceptional incidents occur that could not have been foreseen at the time of contracting, and their occurrence resulted in the implementation of the contractual obligation, and if it did not become impossible, it became burdensome for the debtor, threatening him with heavy loss. The court may, according to the circumstances and after balancing the interests of the two parties, reduce the burdensome obligation to a reasonable limit, and every condition stipulating otherwise shall be null and void (Allah, 2001).

There are conditions for the contingency theory to be applied, and therefore the contract is modified by the judge and this is an exception to the general rule. These conditions are as follows:

1) The contract must be lax in its implementation: the contract is lax if there is a period of time between the issuance of the contract and its implementation, whether the contract is an immediate contract but its implementation is deferred, such as the sales contract in which it is agreed to postpone the delivery of the thing sold, or it is a continuous contract as a contract rent 13. Employment contract of contracts to which the theory of emergency conditions applies; Because it is one of the continuous contracts or time contracts, in which the obligations of both parties to the contract are carried out periodically or continuously, and therefore if the rest of the other conditions that will be referred to are met, the contract can be modified.

2) That a general exceptional accident occurs: What is meant is that the accident should be exceptional and that its occurrence should be rare, provided that what is meant is that the accident should be general and not be limited to the debtor, rather it should happen to a large group of people and the best example of this is the Corona pandemic.

3) That the exceptional event is unexpected: in addition to the fact that the accident is not expected to occur, it is also required that it be something that cannot be prevented, and if it can be prevented, this theory cannot be applied in its regard 14.

4) That the exceptional incident would make the implementation of the obligation stressful for the debtor: it is stipulated that the exhaustion that may befall the debtor should cause him a heavy loss, but if it is a familiar loss, it is not considered, and the assessment of the heavy loss is considered a discretionary authority of the court 15.

Second - The Impact of the Emergency Conditions Theory on Employment Contract in Light of the Corona Pandemic

Except for these conditions, we find that the Corona pandemic is a general exceptional event; Because the pandemic has spread in all countries of the world, it is also an unexpected accident, and since an employment contract is a continuous contract, it is a type of contract to which the theory of emergency conditions applies, and therefore if there is a huge loss that cannot be paid, it can happen to the employer as a result of the procedures taken by states, the employer's obligation can be reimbursed and the wage reduced to a reasonable extent (Moussa, 2009).

The other option is to stop the implementation of the employment contract until this pandemic is over or less so that the implementation of the employment contract becomes possible, and this can be achieved if the employer grants the worker unpaid leave.

This was a common law order, the Omani Civil Transactions Law of 2013, which contains the text referred to and addresses this issue. As for the Labor Law, it states that it is not possible to withhold or waive the wages owed to the worker except within the limits of a quarter, for a debt of alimony or for the payment of the sums owed by him to the government or to the employer, and in case of contention, priority is given to the alimony debt 16.

The Second Topic

Expiry of Employment Contract

First - Majeure Force

If a majeure force occurs in the contracts binding on both sides, and as a result of which the implementation of the obligation has become impossible, the corresponding obligation shall expire and thus the contract shall be voided on its own 17.

In the case where the implementation of the obligation is not possible by becoming impossible, such as the Corona pandemic, the contract is voided by default, and the burden of proof falls on the employer to prove that the Corona pandemic has become a force majeure, and therefore the responsibility of the employer ends due to the impossibility of implementing his obligation to enable the worker to perform the agreed work him because of this majeure force.

But if the impossibility is partial if the debtor performs part of his obligation, then the consideration for the part that has not been performed lapses. This applies to continuous contracts. In the event that part of the contract is implemented, the consideration for what has not been implemented lapses and the creditor has the right to rescind the contract 18. A good example of continuous contracts is employment contract to which this order applies.

According to the text of the first paragraph of Article 172 of the Omani Civil Transactions Law of 2013, which was referred to, there are conditions for applying the force theory and its role in the impossibility of implementation (Musa, 2015):

1) That the contract be a contract binding on both sides: A contract that is binding on both sides is that type of contract that entails reciprocal obligations in the hands of each of its parties 19. The employment contract is one of the binding contracts for both sides, where it entails an obligation in the hands of the worker represented in his carrying out the agreed work and arranges a corresponding obligation for the employer to pay the agreed wage.

2) The failure of one of the contractors to implement his obligation: Either the worker is unable to perform the work or the employer is unable to enable the worker to perform the agreed upon work due to the Corona pandemic or because of the measures taken by countries to close shops.

3) That the impossibility of implementation is due to a foreign reason: The foreign reason is the one that occurs due to a force majeure and one of the parties to the contract has no involvement in it, such as the Corona pandemic.

Second - The Effect of Force Majeure

The effect of force majeure is the termination of the contract. In the event of termination of the contract, the two parties must be returned to the state they were in before the contract 20 and the contract is terminated retroactively. But with regard to continuous contracts or period contracts, it is not conceivable that the contract be rescinded retroactively, but the contract disappears with respect to the future. In other words, the effects of such type of contracts before the termination of the contract remain valid, but the termination is for the part of the contract that was not executed later in the future 21; It is not conceivable in the event of contract termination for the employment contract that it will be rescinded retroactively. It is not possible to restore the situation to what it was in the past, return the work that the worker did in the past, and return the wage to the employer.

Third - The Impossibility of Implementation for an Economic Reason

The Omani legislator did not provide for the dismissal of economic reasons, but it can be considered as one of the reasons which permits the employer to dismiss the worker in the event of its occurrence; It is not reasonable to obligate the employer To keep his workers despite the fact that the facility is in a state of collapse due to poor financial matters, which may have occurred due to reasons beyond his control 22 However, the dismissal of the worker to avoid the economic crisis must not be arbitrary, as the allegation must be real, and this should not be a justification for dismissal worker, and there is another reason that has nothing to do with the interest of work 23.

Fourth - Cases of Contract Termination in the Labor Law

There are cases in which the employer may dismiss the worker and the termination of the employment contract must be based on a legitimate reason 24, stipulated in the Labor Law in Article 40 and it does not apply to the subject of the research 25. Therefore, it is necessary to refer in this regard to the Omani Civil Transactions Law of 2013 due to the absence of a text in the Omani Labor Law of 2013.

There are cases in which the employment contract 26 ends, including the inability of the worker to perform the work and the worker’s illness. Corona’s disease may be one of the diseases that cause the worker’s inability to perform the agreed work; Employment contract of indefinite duration must not be arbitrary and there must be a legitimate justification for the termination of the contract by the employer. Violation of this results in the permissibility of returning the worker to his work or obligating the employer to pay fair compensation to the employee 27.

Fifth: Settling a Dispute between the Employee and the Employer Regarding Dismissal or the Amendment of Employment Contract

The employment contract must be fixed in writing and drawn up in the Arabic language in two copies, for each party a copy. If the contract is drawn up in a language other than Arabic, at least a copy drawn up in Arabic approved by the two parties to the contract shall be attached to it. It shall have the same evidentiary force. If there is no written work contract, the worker may prove his rights by all means of proof, and the worker is given a receipt for the papers and certificates that he has deposited with the employer 28.

The worker must claim his rights within one year from the date of the decision, otherwise he will not be able to claim them in the future if he does not claim them during this period 29.

The worker must file a grievance within the establishment in accordance with the applicable system. If a grievance has not been resolved, or this system is not in place, he must, within fifteen days, submit a request to the competent department in the workforce 30, but this article does not prescribe any penalty to file the case after the lapse of these dates, rather they are organizational dates and their purpose is not to deprive the worker from claiming his rights 31.

The Department of Manpower must resolve the dispute amicably, and if it is done, it must be proven and implementation followed up. If the employer does not implement the implementation, or the settlement is not completed, the department must, within two weeks, refer the dispute to the court. If the court finds that the dismissal was unfair, it must rule to return the worker to work or sentence him to a salary of three months with the last comprehensive salary in addition to the due end-of-service gratuity. He is legally entitled and all other benefits stipulated by law or employment contract, whichever is greater 32.

Conclusion

I would like to thank Allah, before and after, who helped me to complete this research. I would like to point out that the conclusion contains the results and recommendations

First: The Results

1) The Corona pandemic within the scope of labor law can be applied to the theory of emergency conditions; because a pandemic is unexpected and can make the implementation of an employment contract cumbersome for the employer rather than impossible.

2) The Corona pandemic could make the implementation of an employment contract impossible, considering the Corona pandemic a force majeure.

3) Since the pandemic occurred in the year 2019 and surprised the world, there are few legal studies on this matter.

Second: Recommendations

1) We recommend the legislator to put a text in the labor law that addresses the issue of emergency circumstances in a way that does not cause a heavy loss to the employer.

2) We recommend the legislator to put a text in the labor law dealing with the issue of force majeure, with which it is impossible to implement an employment contract.

3) I recommend myself and the researchers to write about this subject because of its great importance, especially that in the future, judicial rulings will be issued which are worthy of study and can be relied upon to find solutions to some of the practical problems that occur in this regard.

Footnotes

    An employment contract ends in any of the following cases:

    1) Expiry of its term or completion of the work agreed upon.

    2) The death of the worker.

    3) The worker's inability to perform his work.

    4) Resignation, dismissal or leaving work in accordance with the provisions of this law.

    5) worker has an illness that necessitates his absence from work for a continuous or separate period of not less than ten weeks within one year.

    a. The worker’s disability or illness shall be proven by a medical certificate, and age shall be proven by the same instrument if it is not possible to prove it by the birth certificate or an official extract thereof. The medical certificate shall be issued by the medical committee formed by a decision of the Minister of Health in coordination with the Minister for the purposes of implementing the law. This decision shall include the organization of work procedures. Its decisions are final.

    b. The contract may not be terminated by the employer unless the worker reaches the age of sixty at least. In case of termination of the contract for one of the aforementioned reasons, the employer must pay the reward stipulated in Article 39 to the worker or his beneficiaries if the worker is not subject to the provisions of the Social Insurance Law.

References

Al-Zein, A. (2020). Sources of voluntary compliance in Omani Law. University Book House, Al-Ain, UAE.

Crossref, Google Scholar

Faraj, T., & Al-Adawi, J. (2002). The general theory of commitment, Al-Halabi Human Rights Publications, Beirut, Lebanon.

Crossref, Google Scholar

Al-Ma’ashani, S. (n.d.). The authority of the employer to amend the contract, without mentioning the country of evil, without c.

Crossref, Google Scholar

al-Sanhoury, A. (n.d.). Mediator in explanation of the new civil law, House of Revival of Arab Heritage, Beirut, Lebanon.

Crossref, Google Scholar

Allah, M. (2001). Civil transactions law, Khartoum.

Crossref, Google Scholar

Moussa, M. (2009). The origins of labor law application in the Sultanate of Oman, Beirut Library, Cairo, Arab Republic of Egypt.

Crossref, Google Scholar

Musa, M. (2015). Al-Wajeez in Omani labor law, University Book House, Al-Ain, UAE, 2015 AD.

Crossref, Google Scholar

Appeal No. 82/2007 High Labor, Session 18/6/2007 AD, a set of judgments issued by the civil departments of the Supreme Court and the principles drawn from them in the period from 1/10/2006 to 30/6/2007 AD, the seventh judicial year, Prepared by the Technical Office of the Omani Supreme Court, p. 1163.

Crossref, Google Scholar

Appeal No. 86/2006, High Workers’ Session, 10/10/2006, a set of judgments issued by the civil departments of the Supreme Court and the principles drawn from them from 10/1/2006 to 30/6/2007, the seventh judicial year. Prepared by the Technical Office of the Omani Supreme Court, p. 1016.

Crossref, Google Scholar

Supreme Commercial Appeal No. 209/2005, session 15/2/2006 AD, a set of judgments issued by the civil departments of the Supreme Court and the principles drawn from them from 1/1/2006 to 06/31/2006 AD, the seventh judicial year, prepared by the Office Technical at the Omani Supreme Court, p. 387.

Crossref, Google Scholar

Appeal No. 194/2005 High Labor, Session 8/5/2006 AD A set of judgments issued by the civil departments of the Supreme Court and the principles drawn from them from 1/1/2006 to 06/31/2006 AD, the seventh judicial year, prepared by the Technical Office Oman Supreme Court, p. 589.

Crossref, Google Scholar

Appeal No. 986/2014, High Civil, Session 20/January/2015 AD, a set of judgments issued by the civil departments of the Supreme Court and the principles drawn from them during the period from 10/1/2014 to 30/6/2016 AD, the fifteenth and sixteenth judicial years, Prepared by the Technical Office of the Omani Supreme Court, pg. 70.

Crossref, Google Scholar

Appeal No. 1272/2014 High Civil (C) Session on Monday 27/April/2014 AD Collection of Judgments issued by the Civil Departments of the Supreme Court and the principles derived from them in the period from 1/10/2014 to 30/6/2016 AD, Judicial Year Fifteenth and Sixteenth, Prepared by the Technical Office of the Omani Supreme Court, p. 292.

Crossref, Google Scholar

Appeal Appeal No. 402/2015 High Civil Session on Monday 4/4/2016 AD A set of judgments issued by the civil departments of the Supreme Court and the principles drawn from them in the period from 1/10/2014 to 30/6/2016 AD, the fifteenth judicial year Sixteenth, prepared by the Technical Office of the Omani Supreme Court, p. 670.

Crossref, Google Scholar

Appeal Appeal No. 401/2015 High Civil Session on Monday 28/December/2015 AD A set of judgments issued by the civil departments of the Supreme Court and the principles drawn from them from 10/1/2014 to 30/6/2016 AD, the fifteenth judicial years Sixteenth, prepared by the Technical Office of the Omani Supreme Court, p. 635.

Crossref, Google Scholar

Received: 29-Dec-2021, Manuscript No. JLERI-21-10492; Editor assigned: 01-Jan-2022, PreQC No. JLERI-21-10492(PQ); Reviewed: 14-Jan-2022, QC No. JLERI-21-10492; Revised: 19-Jan-2022, Manuscript No. JLERI-21-10492(R); Published: 29-Jan-2022

Get the App