Journal of Economics and Economic Education Research (Print ISSN: 1533-3590; Online ISSN: 1533-3604)

Short communication: 2023 Vol: 24 Issue: 1

Simulation Modeling to Estimate Population Grounded Health Programs for Habitual Complaint and Control

Donglan Prasongchai, University Cheikh Anta Diop

Citation Information: Prasongchai, D. (2023). Simulation modeling to estimate population grounded health programs for habitual complaint and control. Journal of Economics and Economic Education Research, 24(1), 1-3.

Abstract

Over the once many decades, numerous countries around the world have been facing a growing burden of habitual conditions including heart complaint, stroke, diabetes, and rotundity. For illustration, in 2013 nearly half of the adult population in the United States( US) had at least one habitual condition; and roughly 70 percent of deaths were caused by habitual conditions. It was estimated that the total impact of habitual complaint on the US frugality was$1.3 trillion annually. Encyclopedically, habitual conditions are leading causes of death. In 2013, the top five causes of deaths were ischemic heart complaint, lower respiratory infections, cerebrovascular complaint, downward back and neck pain, and road injuries. As the epidemic of habitual conditions continues to grow unabated around the world, there's an critical need for public health leaders, health care providers, and policymakers to make substantiation- grounded opinions to reduce the burden of habitual complaint and ameliorate population health.

Keywords

Grounded Health, Habitual Conditions, Health Programs.

Introduction

A new paradigm in habitual complaint forestallment and operation has evolved, whereby individual- position approaches are rounded with population- position and policy changes to alleviate the. While styles for formal evaluation of these broad changes are community- grounded randomized controlled trials, these designs are expensive and frequently not doable to apply in confluence with policy advances. In this environment, logical approaches similar as simulation modeling and econometric analysis give important perceptivity into changes in threat factors across target populations amidst policy changes ( Graber et al., 2012).

These logical approaches have also handed policymakers with high- quality substantiation on both the short- and long- term impact of different programs on health and profitable issues. Although simulation modeling and econometric analysis are constantly used for program evaluation, there's no formal frame for the integration of both approaches for habitual complaint forestallment and control. In this study, we developed a frame to combine econometric analysis and simulation modeling for a comprehensive policy impact evaluation. We demonstrated the operation of this frame through a case study that estimated the short- term impact and long- term cost- effectiveness of the hypertension- webbing program under the Essential Public Health Services( EPHS) policy in China ( Kendall et al., 2018).

Econometric analysis and simulation modeling has been used independently to assess the effectiveness and cost- effectiveness of a population- grounded health policy still, many studies have combined the two styles to assess both the short- and long- term impact of a policy. Policy impact analysis using natural trial design and empirical econometric models have long been favored by economists and other social scientists; while simulation modeling has been applied largely by systems masterminds, computer scientists, ecologists and a lower number of social scientists. Although there has been a lack of dispatches and understanding between the two seminaries of wisdom, the growing demand for substantiation in drug and public health calls for the integration of both styles that are rather reciprocal to each other ( Walters et al., 2020).

Common econometric approaches for policy impact analysis include the difference- in- difference( DID) approach, the necessary- variables( IVs) approach, and the retrogression discontinuity( RD) approach(. These approaches use aquasi-experimental design( DID and RD) or apseudo-randomization( IVs) to produce the counterfactual script for estimation of the unproductive effect of a population- grounded policy because a randomized controlled trial – the gold standard for unproductive conclusion – is frequently infeasible for assessing population- grounded programs that are formerly in place ( Wettasinghe et al.,2020).

The hypertensive cases would enthrall the “Hypertension” state and move to other countries related to the hypertension state. The events causing the transition was the CVD events, including coronary heart complaint (CHD) and stroke, in which the CHD countries include arrest, angina, myocardial infarction (MI). We also took into consideration the adverse events happed on the case due to the use of anti-hypertensive drug either, there were absorbing countries included-Fatal Events state and Natural Death state, and cases would be considered dead when they conveyance to this state. An periodic cost and quality- of- life mileage were assigned for each health state and would be accumulated as the simulation runs ( Yalim et al., 2019). 

Conclusion

The model affair measures were health issues, costs, and QALYs. The transition between two different countries was grounded on the transition chances. The policy will increase the proportion of hypertensive cases who are under control. The generalities of substantiation- grounded public health attracted important attention along with the growing complications of the health care system. The strong demand exists on assessing the effectiveness of one intervention and deciding its implicit values using being data. In numerous cases, policymakers need substantiation on the impact of the being population- grounded policy and also prognosticate the unborn burden of the targeted habitual complaint as well as its profitable impact. The econometric analysis is frequently considered an important logical tool accelerating substantiation- grounded public health. still, the main limitation of this tool is that it depends veritably much on the vacuity and quality of the applicable data.

References

Graber, K. C., Woods, A. M., & O’Connor, J. A. (2012). Impact of wellness legislation on comprehensive school health programs. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 31(2), 163-181.

Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross Ref

Kendall, S., Redshaw, S., Ward, S., Wayland, S., & Sullivan, E. (2018). ).Systematic review of qualitative evaluations of reentry programs addressing problematic drug use and mental health disorders amongst people transitioning from prison to communities Health & justice, 6(1), 1-11.

Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross Ref

Walters, K. L., Johnson-Jennings, M., Stroud, S., Rasmus, S., Charles, B., John, S., & Boulafentis, J. (2020).Growing from our roots: Strategies for developing culturally grounded health promotion interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian communities. Prevention Science, 21, 54-64.

Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross Ref

Wettasinghe, P. M., Allan, W., Garvey, G., Timbery, A., Hoskins, S., Veinovic, M., & Delbaere, K. (2020). Older aboriginal australians’ health concerns and preferences for healthy ageing programs. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(20), 7390.

Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross Ref

Yalim, A. C., Kim, W., & Kim, I. (2019). Challenges in health-care service use among Burmese refugees: A grounded theory approach. Social Work in Health Care, 58(7), 665-684.

Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross Ref

Received: 05-Jan-2023, Manuscript No. JEEER-22-13120; Editor assigned: 07-Jan-2023, Pre QC No. JEEER-22-13120 (PQ); Reviewed: 21-Jan-2023, QC No. JEEER-22-13120; Revised: 24-Jan-2023, Manuscript No. JEEER-22-13120(R); Published: 31-Jan-2023

Get the App